Mike Lee
Status:
Committed
HIGH SCHOOL

Mike Lee

Cornerback
5′11″ / 170 lbs
New Orleans, LA
Landry-Walker
Class of 2017
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: 89.3
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Kansas
Committed
6/9/2016
Texas A&M
None
Arizona State
None
California
None
Colorado
None
Georgia
None
Louisiana Monroe
None
Miami
None
Missouri
None
North Carolina
None
Purdue
None
Tennessee
None
Texas Tech
None
Utah
None
UTSA
None
West Virginia
None
+ 11 More

Updates

Recruiting Snapshot: Aggies' top targets at defensive back
7 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Recruiting Snapshot: Aggies' top targets at defensive back
Texas A&M's haul in the secondary is already bursting at the seams with four prospects committed, but Terry Joseph and John Chavis are looking to add one last piece to the puzzle. Which cover men have captured the Aggies' interest, and which are looking their way?
Ryan Brauninger
7 yr ago by Ryan Brauninger
A&M offers New Orleans teammates
Defensive backs Corione Harris (2018) and Mike Lee (2017) of Landry Walker HS in New Orleans both picked up A&M offers throughout the course of the day yesterday. For Lee, the A&M offer was his 13th overall. He's racked up scholarships from Tennessee, North Carolina, Miami, Arizona State, Georgia, and Texas Tech. At 5-11, 170 pounds, he's a tad undersized from the typical Chavis corner, but he can really run. Lee may be making a college choice soon. If the Ags want to land him, they'll have to get him to campus or possibly make a big impression at the New Orleans satellite camp. Harris is a 2018 LSU commit that's got other SEC offers from Florida, Auburn, Arkansas, and Mississippi State. He's a bit longer than Lee standing at 6-1, 175 pounds. Obviously, there's still a long way to go with Harris, but it's awfully tough to flip kids that LSU wants in that state.

Photos

(1 Total)
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.