Status:
Committed
HIGH SCHOOL
S

Grant Delpit

Safety
6′2″ / 180 lbs
Bradenton, FL
IMG Academy
Class of 2017
Rating: 93
?

National Avg
Rating: 95.5
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Recruited by
LSU
Signed
Texas A&M
None
Baylor
None
Houston
None
Miami
None
Oklahoma
None
Ole Miss
None
TCU
None
+ 3 More

Staff Predictions

?
Confidence
Prediction
Name & Date
Billy Liucci
on Jan 23, 2017
David Sandhop
on Jun 22, 2016
Jason Howell
on May 21, 2016
Ryan Brauninger
on May 23, 2016

Updates

(11 Total)
3 mo ago by Jason Howell
Around Texas: The top in-state performances of Signing Day 2017
National Signing Day has come and gone, and the biggest names around the state have signed with their schools of choice. Jason Howell takes a look at each in-state school's class, the biggest wins and toughest hits of recruiting's most important day.
4 mo ago by Jason Howell
Around Texas: A round-up of recruiting news in the Lone Star State
As the 2017 recruiting cycle comes to a close, big names across Texas are choosing their college destinations. Jason Howell has all the latest developments from around the state in this week's edition of Around Texas.
8 mo ago by Ryan Brauninger
Recruiting notes - LSU targets & more
11 mo ago by Billy Liucci
Breaking down the fallout from Texas A&M's recruiting weekend
With the camp at Coppell High School and the Yessir BBQ behind the Aggies, Billy Liucci takes on a host of Texas A&M recruiting topics, analyzing the reaction and possible implications stemming from the weekend. Which prospects took notice?
11 mo ago by Billy Liucci
Recruiting Snapshot: Aggies' top targets at defensive back
Texas A&M's haul in the secondary is already bursting at the seams with four prospects committed, but Terry Joseph and John Chavis are looking to add one last piece to the puzzle. Which cover men have captured the Aggies' interest, and which are looking their way?
Load More

Photos

(3 Total)
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state of Texas and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state of Texas and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state of Texas. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
Verify your student status
See Membership Benefits >