default image
Status:
Uncommitted

Ross Donnely

Defensive Tackle
6′2″ / 300 lbs
Houston, TX
Cy Fair
Class of 2015
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: n/a
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
None
 
Oklahoma
None
 
Stanford
None
 
Texas
None
 

Updates

Quarterfinal Edition: Commits & targets to watch
10 yr ago by Brice Jones
Quarterfinal Edition: Commits & targets to watch
Every week during the Texas high school football season, TexAgs breaks down where every Aggie commit will be playing. Spotlighted next to A&M's verbals are remaining prospects the Aggie staff has its eye on.
Recruiting Snapshot: What's next for Sumlin, Aggies?
11 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Recruiting Snapshot: What's next for Sumlin, Aggies?
Texas A&M continues its efforts on an elite class and June rolls along in a constant interplay of needs and numbers. How many will the Aggies take, who's high on the board and how will the 2015 class set up?
Post-Camp Reset: Offers, near-misses & next targets
11 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Post-Camp Reset: Offers, near-misses & next targets
The Aggies welcomed an esteemed contingent of 2014 and '15 recruits to College Station on Sunday, all with the goal of an A&M offer in mind. Following strong showings and new offers, Liucci recaps the latest.
List of visitors at Texas A&M's Sunday camp
11 yr ago by Brice Jones
List of visitors at Texas A&M's Sunday camp
Noteworthy prospects from the classes of 2014 and 2015 journeyed to College Station on Sunday for the Aggies' camp, with several sights set on offers. Follow the confirmed arrivals and discussion on Premium.

Career Stats

Season

Honors

2011

17-5A Second Team All-District

2012

17-5A Second Team All-District

2013

First Team All-Greater Houston (Chron)
17-5A First Team All-District
5A Region III First Team Elite Team (TXHSFB)

2014

First Team All-Greater Houston (Chron)
17-6A First Team All-District
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.