Aaron Medley

Kicker

6′2″ / 165 lbs

Lewisburg, TN

Lewisburg

Class of 2014

Rating: n/a

National Avg

Rating: n/a

School Preferences

Texas A&M

None

Oklahoma

None

Updates

6 yr ago by Ryan Brauninger

Visitor list - June 9th

Here it is. Some really good players on here so far. Be sure to check in throughout the week for additions/subtractions.Texas A&M commitsSt Pius WR Chase Lane Dayton OLB RJ Orebo A&M Consolidated DT Josh Ellison Colleyville Heritage WR Kameron Brown Katy Taylor DE Braedon Mowry Bishop Dunne S Brian Williams Converse Judson DE DeMarvin Leal Waxahachie S Demani Richardson Brock TE Baylor Cupp Harrisburg (PA) LB Andre White 2020'sNavasota OL Jordan Jefferson The Woodlands College Park OL Josh Bankhead Ft Bend Kempner OL Akinola Ogunbiyi Ft Bend Hightower OL Smart Chibuzo Uncommitted targets2019Houston North Forest OL Javonne Shepherd Horn Lake (MS) LB Nakobe Dean Buford (GA) QB Zach Calzada Ft Bend Bush CB Erick Young Houston Madison CB Bobby Wolfe Klein Collins RB Isaiah Spiller (maybe)Amarillo Tascosa RB King Doerue Baton Rouge (LA) LB Christian Harris Pensacola (FL) OL Adrian Medley Pensacola (FL) OL Hunter Rayburn St Pius WR Jalen Curry Newton ATH Tamauzia Brown West Mesquite WR Dylan WrightAtlanta (GA) LB Nick Jackson Dutchtown (GA) LB Kevon Glenn Midlothian Heritage WR Langston Anderson - maybeHallsville OL Blake Trainor Cinco Ranch LB David Gbenda Dickinson TE Jalen Wydermyer (maybe)Katy Mayde Creek DE Marcus Stripling St Louis (MO) QB Nate Martens2020Houston Austin QB Malik Hornsby North Shore RB Zach Evans Ft Bend Austin OL Kendal Septs Ft Bend Austin WR Troy Omeire Mesquite Poteet RB Seth McGowan Duncanville S Chris Thompson Duncanville ATH Ja'Quinden JacksonNewton DE James Sylvester 2021Mesquite Horn LB Kendrick Blackshire - maybeCoppell WR KJ Liggins As of now, there's no Kenyon Green due to a family function. We'll let you know if that changes. Like I said, keep coming back as we update the list.

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”

Follow TexAgs