Sione Sina

Defensive End

6′4″ / 245 lbs

San Mateo, CA

College of San Mateo

Class of 2013

Rating: n/a

National Avg

Rating: n/a

School Preferences

Updates

11 yr ago by Billy Liucci

Are A&M's top targets nearing decisions?

Several high-profile visitors took in the Aggies' season-ending victory against Missouri, but the state's best high school prospects and some key JUCO names have yet to make the call. Which domino might soon fall?

11 yr ago by Billy Liucci

Recruiting Review: Big visitors bookend Thanksgiving week

Texas A&M continues the search to fill limited 2013 spots from among various combinations. With several JUCO targets visiting last weekend and top high school names planning to attend for Mizzou, what's next?

11 yr ago by Billy Liucci

Recruiting Review: A&M's momentum reaching crescendo

In beating 'Bama, the Aggies shook more than the BCS standings. With A&M holding precious few open spots in the '13 class and some of the nation's top prospects beating down the door, how will the chips fall?

11 yr ago by Billy Liucci

Recruiting Review: Keys to combing the JUCO ranks

The Aggie staff is well-positioned to roll multiple junior college prospects back to the 2012 class and add a trio of mid-termers. Which hot JUCO names and positions of need are in the running to fill out the numbers?

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”

Follow TexAgs