Status:
Signed
HIGH SCHOOL
DB

Otis Jacobs

Defensive Back
6′0″ / 185 lbs
Perkinston, MS
Gulf Coast C.C. (MS)
Class of 2012
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: 88.0
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Recruited by
Texas A&M
Signed
Williams

Staff Predictions

?
Confidence
Prediction
Name & Date
Our staff hasn't made any predictions for Otis Jacobs yet.

Videos

(1 Total)
Listing the top five newcomers not named Trey Williams

Updates

7 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Five in Five: A&M's five biggest burning questions
The Aggies' most anticipated Fall Camp in recent memory kicked off with appropriate fanfare, counting the days until A&M's inaugural SEC season. But these 29 practices, Liucci writes, will provide important answers.
7 yr ago by Logan Lee
Listing the top five newcomers not named Trey Williams
The recruiting team of Logan Lee, Brandon Leone and Brice Jones teamed up during Tuesday's installment of TexAgs Radio to name the top five newcomers (not named Trey Williams) that they are excited to see.
7 yr ago by Brandon Leone
Five In Five: Spring's most improved players
Several Aggies emerged from the spring camp session with raised ceilings, showing marked growth under the new staff. In a series of five topics in five days, former A&M DB/RB Brandon Leone examines.
7 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Final impressions from A&M's spring camp (Part 2)
The new-look Aggies entered the spring season with a litany of questions to answer and left with a few hunches in the right direction. Who and what else stood out during Kevin Sumlin's first spring in Aggieland?
7 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Final impressions from A&M's spring camp (Part 1)
Kevin Sumlin and his meticulously-assembled staff rode into Aggieland on the winds of change. Following a spring season watched closely by all, Liucci sifts through the promise and potential A&M will take to the fall.
All Updates

Photos

(2 Total)
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.