default image
Status:
Uncommitted

Tre Mason

Running Back
5′10″ / 190 lbs
Boynton Beach, FL
Park Vista (FL)
Class of 2011
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: n/a
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
None
Louisville
None
 
Ole Miss
None
 
Penn State
None
 
West Virginia
None
 

Updates

Recruiting Watch: Week Ten Stats (Commits / Targets)
13 yr ago by Logan Lee
Recruiting Watch: Week Ten Stats (Commits / Targets)
In the final week of the regular season, several Aggie commits and targets posted some big numbers, as a few saw their high school careers come to an end, while others are gearing up for the post-season.
The Inside Scoop: Liucci's weekly recruiting update
13 yr ago by Billy Liucci
The Inside Scoop: Liucci's weekly recruiting update
Billy Liucci is the foremost insider and expert on Texas A&M recruiting. In his weekly recruiting update, he takes a close look at several interesting developments from around the state as it relates to Aggie Football.
Recruit Watch: Week Nine Stats (Commits / Targets)
13 yr ago by Logan Lee
Recruit Watch: Week Nine Stats (Commits / Targets)
Aggie commits Manziel and Matthews produced their usual numbers, while Jonathon Henderson had his best game of the year. Donovonn Young continues to turn heads with another impressive showing.
Recruiting Watch: Week Eight Stats for Commits and Targets
13 yr ago by Logan Lee
Recruiting Watch: Week Eight Stats for Commits and Targets
TexAgs.com brings you the stats of the Aggie Commits and recruits throughout the week in high school football. Aggie commits Johnny Manziel and Howard Matthews stand out in week eight action.
Recruiting: Week Four Stats Commits/Notables
13 yr ago by Logan Lee
Recruiting: Week Four Stats Commits/Notables
After a slow week of High School football, the offenses really picked up and the recruits gave us a lot to write about in Week Four of the 2010 season.
All Updates
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.