default image
Status:
Uncommitted

Corey Coleman

Athlete
5′11″ / 180 lbs
Richardson, TX
Pearce
Class of 2012
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: n/a
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Oklahoma
None
 
Oklahoma State
None
 
Texas
None
 

Updates

Recruiting Breakdown - Possible Scenarios for Sumlin
13 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Recruiting Breakdown - Possible Scenarios for Sumlin
TexAgs breaks down the class of 2012. Billy Liucci examines a handful of options and directions Kevin Sumlin can take to finish out and solidify this year's recruiting class for Texas A&M.
Nike Camp Observations
13 yr ago by Brice Jones
Nike Camp Observations
Brice Jones and Logan Lee attended the Nike Camp in Fort Worth on Sunday, which featured several top-flight prospects. Get the latest on who stood out and who to keep an eye on in '12 and '13 recruiting.
Aggie Recruiting: A Christmas Wish List for 2012
13 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Aggie Recruiting: A Christmas Wish List for 2012
Billy Liucci breaks down Texas A&M's "wish list" for the class of 2012, taking a position-by-position look. Find out who the coaching staff's key targets and top-level prospects are for the current junior class.
The Inside Scoop: Liucci's recruiting update
14 yr ago by Billy Liucci
The Inside Scoop: Liucci's recruiting update
Billy Liucci is the foremost insider and expert on Texas A&M recruiting. In his weekly recruiting update, he takes a close look at several interesting developments from around the state as it relates to Aggie Football.
Recruiting: Week Six Stats (Commits/Notables)
14 yr ago by Logan Lee
Recruiting: Week Six Stats (Commits/Notables)
Week Six was yet another week loaded with high school offenses running around most of the defensive units on the field and racking up big numbers on the stat sheets.
All Updates

Photos

(2 Total)

Career Stats

Season

Honors

2011

4A Second Team All-State (AP)
First Team DFW All-Area Team (DMN)
10-4A First Team All-District
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.