Elijah Butler
Status:
Committed
HIGH SCHOOL

Elijah Butler

Safety
6′3″ / 190 lbs
Baltimore, MD
St. Frances Academy
Class of 2027
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: 89.0
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Virginia Tech
Committed
5/8/2026
Texas A&M
None
Alabama
None
Auburn
None
Boston College
None
Florida
None
Georgia Tech
None
Indiana
None
Maryland
None
Miami
None
Michigan
None
Nebraska
None
Ole Miss
None
Oregon
None
Purdue
None
Sacramento State
None
South Florida
None
Syracuse
None
Wisconsin
None
+ 14 More

Updates

Cade Draughon
7 mo ago by Cade Draughon
Texas A&M Scholarship Offer Recap 1/11-1/18
2027WR Quentin Burrell, Chicago (IL) Mount Carmel - Offer Date: Jan. 16https://www.hudl.com/video/3/20228458/6932735faf641c02818fa851TE Holden Niemi, Dexter (MI) - Offer Date: Jan. 12https://www.hudl.com/video/3/20478755/68d49e850f5aa350d2c6adf9ATH Elijah Butler, Baltimore (MD) St. Frances Academy - Offer Date: Jan. 17https://www.hudl.com/video/3/17872990/68ccbf56316cb99b58c91bf8DT Brayden Parks, Chicago (IL) Brother Rice - Offer Date: Jan. 16https://www.hudl.com/video/3/19549649/69391613b01409f9212ae302S Jayden Aparicio-Bailey, Prattville (AL) - Offer Date: Jan. 13https://www.hudl.com/video/3/19481104/68d415651d1e649e741755dfK Andres Von Der Meden, Tomball (TX) - Offer Date: Jan. 17https://www.hudl.com/video/3/19732973/68c15232186c18e53ccfdab32028WR Marshaun Thornton, Chicago (IL) Mount Carmel - Offer Date: Jan. 16https://www.hudl.com/video/3/22832731/68e523d8166a30b97d8cb0a3TE Breck Brady, Bethany (OK) - Offer Date: Jan. 15https://www.hudl.com/video/3/20200503/6915ef6d4f38d669b7dd9359EDGE Kameron McGee, Chicago (IL) Brother Rice - Offer Date: Jan. 16https://www.hudl.com/video/3/22741972/6935a1fcea0d31db039370faEDGE Darieon Prescott, Bolingbrook (IL) - Offer Date: Jan. 16https://www.hudl.com/video/3/22593215/690e28a5aa5ee38364f9170bDT Caleb Tucker, Chicago (IL) Mount Carmel - Offer Date: Jan. 17https://www.hudl.com/video/3/22859648/695f3151fa1d6072c74c62fa2029CB Carlos Lopez, Coconut Creek (FL) Monarch - Offer Date: Jan. 12
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.