Trey Haddad

Wide Receiver

6′1″ / 180 lbs

Cleveland, OH

St. Ignatius

Class of 2027

TreyHaddad3

Rating: n/a

National Avg

Rating: n/a

School Preferences

Texas A&M

Medium

West Virginia

Medium

Updates

8 mo ago by Cade Draughon

Texas A&M Scholarship Offer Recap 8/17-8/24

2027WR Trey Haddad, Cleveland (OH) St. Ignatius - Offer Date: Aug. 23https://www.hudl.com/video/3/19543956/68a86e79621cb7c6ebc608af2028WR Braylon Clark, Charlotte (NC) Charlotte Country Day - Offer Date: Aug. 19https://www.hudl.com/video/3/20082341/673a8c13ee1ab01e17e0a76bWR Carter St. Junious, Manvel (TX) - Offer Date: Aug. 22https://www.hudl.com/video/3/22707230/68a7e4e3504893ddf435229fATH CJ Whaley, Atlanta (TX) - Offer Date: Aug. 22https://www.hudl.com/video/3/23979300/671900fb8902a92fcdedcef7ATH Kamieon Compton-Nero, Owasso (OK) Rejoice Christian School - Offer Date: Aug. 18https://www.hudl.com/video/3/20650953/6789ad7c9c703c63670f2832LB Deshawn Simmons, Fort Walton Beach (FL) Choctawhatchee - Offer Date: Aug. 23https://www.hudl.com/video/3/23183721/66ec2f8c9b4596cc7c47142aCB Zion Davis, Miami (FL) Miami Killian - Offer Date: Aug. 20https://www.hudl.com/video/3/22787460/66fc386f7615bfe88076d0a2S Casey Barner, Powder Springs (GA) McEachern - Offer Date: Aug. 18https://www.hudl.com/video/3/22565505/68aafcbfde3ec453e7f4327d2029 DT Martell Shannon, Miami (FL) Southridge - Offer Date: Aug. 23

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”

Follow TexAgs