default image
Status:
Uncommitted
HIGH SCHOOL

Earnest Rankins

Defensive Tackle
6′6″ / 285 lbs
Decatur, GA
Southwest DeKalb
Class of 2026
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: n/a
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
Medium
Alabama
Medium
Appalachian State
Medium
Auburn
Medium
Georgia
Medium
Georgia State
Medium
Kentucky
Medium
South Carolina
Medium
Syracuse
Medium
Temple
Medium
Tennessee
Medium
UAB
Medium
Wake Forest
Medium
West Virginia
Medium
Western Kentucky
Medium
Western Michigan
Medium
+ 11 More

Updates

Cade Draughon
11 days ago by Cade Draughon
Texas A&M Scholarship Offer Recap 10/29-11/2
2026WR Joel Wyatt, Bell Buckle (TN) The Webb School - Offer Date: Nov. 1https://www.hudl.com/video/3/13849642/670c1258864ff0418c3f51d8DL Earnest Rankins, Decatur (GA) Southwest DeKalb - Offer Date: Nov. 1https://www.hudl.com/video/3/22596650/671ed665ef5460954fec7f92DL Cameron McGee, Loganville (GA) Grayson - Offer Date: Nov. 12027OT Joshua Sam Epelle, Douglasville (GA) Douglas County - Offer Date: Nov. 1https://www.hudl.com/video/3/19610168/64e8b8840c53820878832057DE KJ Green, Stone Mountain (GA) Stephenson - Offer Date: Nov. 1https://www.hudl.com/video/3/19528377/66cd0317fc017c5408c501e3DL Waylon Wooten, Loganville (GA) Grayson - Offer Date: Nov. 1https://www.hudl.com/video/3/20041728/66f05ab92219e50b9a6c2c0b2028RB Micah Rhodes, Spring (TX) Klein Oak - Offer Date: Oct. 29https://www.hudl.com/video/3/18507350/671bb49a627ae3ca67d6a5b1DE Christian Webb-Scott, Buford (GA) Buford - Offer Date: Nov. 1https://www.hudl.com/video/3/17999904/671691139e0efb242669f25eDE Ismael Schiefer, Loganville (GA) Grayson - Offer Date: Nov. 1https://www.hudl.com/video/3/23116671/66be410fca0dcf4da00b77c9DE Luke Nabors, Buford (GA) Buford - Offer Date: Nov. 1https://www.hudl.com/video/3/22406990/671692a8c72f561a1c0eab83DE Elijah Tillman, Loganville (GA) Grayson - Offer Date: Nov. 1
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.