default image
Status:
Uncommitted
HIGH SCHOOL

Tarvos Alford

Linebacker
6′2″ / 210 lbs
Vero Beach, FL
Vero Beach
Class of 2025
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: 93.7
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit

Videos

(1 Total)
Sophomore Season!

Updates

Cade Draughon
1 yr ago by Cade Draughon
Texas A&M Scholarship Offer Recap 12/16-12/22
Transfer PortalRB EJ Smith, Dallas (TX) Stanford - Offer Date: Dec. 19https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPWQ4jUoDGghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3SaSReW4ewTE Tre Watson, Rio Rancho (NM) Fresno State - Offer Date: Dec. 18OT Michael Tarquin, Citra (FL) USC - Offer Date: Dec. 17OL Kurt Danneker, Williamsport (PA) Ohio - Offer Date: Dec. 18DL Anton Juncaj, Port Jervis (NY) Albany - Offer Date: Dec. 18DL Elijah Alston, Chesapeake (VA) Marshall - Offer Date: Dec. 21S Marcus Ratcliffe, San Diego (CA) San Diego State - Offer Date: Dec. 17S DJ Douglas, Alabaster (AL) Tulane - Offer Date: Dec. 192025QB Alex Manske, Algona (IA) Algona - Offer Date: Dec. 17https://www.hudl.com/video/3/13547078/653d78015b3cca0de86153fbATH Mike Peterson Jr., Gainesville (FL) F. W. Buchholz - Offer Date: Dec. 21https://www.hudl.com/video/3/17449606/656b6fc19a9bf106a4a34b0eWR Vernell Brown III, Orlando (FL) Jones - Offer Date: Dec. 20https://www.hudl.com/video/3/13460248/6571056b176c7808f4b17bc0TE Bear Tenney, Lucas (TX) Lovejoy - Offer Date: Dec. 21https://www.hudl.com/video/3/16071537/652ee4222347d20738ae4ac3OT Andrew Babalola, Overland Park (KS) Blue Valley Northwest - Offer Date: Dec. 18https://www.hudl.com/video/3/16786580/6536b4dfd224e20b30e4d439DL Malik Autry, Opelika (AL) Opelika - Offer Date: Dec. 18https://www.hudl.com/video/3/16281475/654991e3688e3509745166f7LB Tarvos Alford, Vero Beach (FL) Vero Beach - Offer Date: Dec. 21CB Shamari Earls, Chester (VA) Thomas Dale - Offer Date: Dec. 19https://www.hudl.com/video/3/16172911/656d2259a677250bdcda08b8
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.