Status:
Committed
HIGH SCHOOL
Khyren Haywood
School Preferences
School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas Tech
Committed
6/1/2026
Texas A&M
None
Arizona
None
Arizona State
None
Arkansas
None
Baylor
None
California
None
Colorado
None
Florida State
None
Houston
None
Kansas
None
Kansas State
None
LSU
None
Memphis
None
Mississippi State
None
North Texas
None
Northwestern
None
Oklahoma State
None
Ole Miss
None
Oregon
None
Pittsburgh
None
Purdue
None
Sacramento State
None
SMU
None
Stanford
None
Syracuse
None
TCU
None
Texas
None
Tulane
None
UCLA
None
USC
None
UTSA
None
Washington
None
Washington State
None
+ 29 More
Videos
(7 Total)
9/11/2026
Highlights: Waxahachie claims hard-fought road win at Denton Guyer
9/9/2026
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
8/26/2026
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
10/10/2025
Highlights: Denton Guyer utilizes second half burst to beat Hebron
1/27/2025
2027 Denton Guyer DL Khyren Haywood speaks highly of Texas A&M
8/10/2024
2027 Denton Guyer DT Khyren Haywood shares experience visiting A&M
12/30/1969
Junior Varsity Season Highlights
Photos
(13 Total)
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.×