Jordan Andrus
Status:
Uncommitted
HIGH SCHOOL

Jordan Andrus

Tight End
6′4″ / 225 lbs
Houston, TX
Houston Yates
Class of 2024
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: n/a
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Alcorn State
Medium
Arizona State
Medium
Georgia Tech
Medium
Grambling
Medium
North Texas
Medium
Prairie View A&M
Medium
Sam Houston
Medium
SMU
Medium
Texas Southern
Medium
Texas State
Medium
+ 5 More

Updates

Jason Howell
3 mo ago by Jason Howell
Weekend Recruiting Thread - April 12-14
Mike Elko and his staff are once again set to host a talented group of prospects this weekend. These lists are always subject to change, and you can expect a few additions and subtractions.April 13 2025sDL Landon Rink, Cypress (TX) Cy-Fair Texas A&MTE Jordan Andrus, Houston (TX) YatesWR Emmanuel Choice, Lancaster (TX) OL Andrew Babalola, Overland Park (KS) Blue Valley NorthwestOL Connor Carty, Prosper (TX)OL Henry Fenuku, Crowley (TX) North CrowleyOL Ty Haywood, Denton (TX) RyanOL Emeka Ugorji , Dallas (TX) South Oak CliffOL Tyler Thomas, Dickinson (TX)OL Jonte Newman, Cypress (TX) BridgelandOL Byron Nelson, Katy (TX)DT Chace Sims, Richmond (TX) RandleEdge Javion Hilson, Cocoa (FL) - Florida State commitEdge Keiundre Johnson, Terrell (TX)Edge Marco Jones, Danville (CA) San Ramon Valley LB Riley Pettijohn, McKinney (TX) LB Richmond Ugochukwu , Richardson (TX) BerknerCB Adonyss Currie, Lancaster (CA) Quartz HillCB Jamar Beal-Goines, Pheonix (AZ) Desert EdgeCB Dawayne Galloway, Columbus (OH) Marion-FranklinCB Courtland Guillory, Klein (TX) OakCB Cobey Sellers, Pearland (TX) Shadow CreekS Rylon Dillard-Allen, Phoenix (AZ) Mountain PointeATH Zaylen Cormier, Houston (TX) Heights2026sRB KJ Edwards, Carthage (TX)TE Zachery Turner, Duncanville (TX)OL John Turntine, Crowley (TX) North Crowley ATH Mack Sutter, Dunlap (IL)2027sWR Antayvious Ellis, Crowley (TX)

Photos

(5 Total)
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.