Status:
Signed
School Preferences
School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
Signed
Auburn
None
Austin Peay
None
Baylor
None
Boston College
None
California
None
Cincinnati
None
Colorado
None
East Texas A&M
None
Florida State
None
Georgia Tech
None
Houston
None
Kansas
None
Louisville
None
Nebraska
None
Oregon
None
Penn
None
Penn State
None
Purdue
None
Sam Houston
None
San Diego State
None
Syracuse
None
TCU
None
Texas State
None
Texas Tech
None
UNLV
None
+ 21 More
Videos
(16 Total)
12/20/2023
A&M's Mike Elko targeting 'quality, not quantity' in 2024 signing class
12/11/2023
In-Home Visit: Will Lee's commitment, Elko's first OV weekend & more
12/1/2023
Highlights: Ganado advances to semifinals with 41-12 win over Refugio
9/22/2023
Highlights: Refugio dominates Bloomington in 'Battle of the Bobcats'
9/6/2023
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
8/21/2023
Lunch with Liucci: Billy Liucci joins TexAgs Radio (Monday, August 21)
8/2/2023
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
7/24/2023
Jason Herring calls A&M commit Ernest Campbell the 'real package'
7/21/2023
Lunch with Liucci: Billy Liucci joins TexAgs Radio (Friday, July 21)
7/15/2023
Dual-sport opportunity played a 'big factor' in Campbell's commitment
7/15/2023
In-Home Visit: A&M adds Ernest Campbell's elite speed to 2024 haul
7/14/2023
Lunch with Liucci: Billy Liucci joins TexAgs Radio (Friday, July 14)
7/6/2023
2024 WR Ernest Campbell keeping A&M among his top schools
7/5/2023
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
3/27/2023
In-Home Visit: Gauging Texas A&M progress in the class of 2024, Part 1
12/30/1969
Ernest Campbell, '24 WR/DB - JR Year
Updates
Photos
(16 Total)
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.×