Kayden McDonald
Status:
Uncommitted
HIGH SCHOOL

Kayden McDonald

Defensive Tackle
6′3″ / 325 lbs
Suwanee, GA
North Gwinnett
Class of 2023
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: 90.0
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Georgia
High
Michigan State
High
Texas A&M
Medium
Arkansas
Medium
Boston College
Medium
Central Florida
Medium
Connecticut
Medium
Duke
Medium
Florida State
Medium
Georgia State
Medium
Georgia Tech
Medium
Jackson State
Medium
Kansas
Medium
Louisville
Medium
Michigan
Medium
Mississippi State
Medium
NC State
Medium
Nebraska
Medium
Ohio State
Medium
Ole Miss
Medium
Pittsburgh
Medium
Purdue
Medium
Tennessee
Medium
Troy
Medium
USC
Medium
Vanderbilt
Medium
Wisconsin
Medium
+ 22 More

Updates

Jason Howell
2 mo ago by Jason Howell
Weekend Recruiting Thread
We'll be posting news and notes here throughout the weekend.Here's a look at the visitor list2023'sWylie (TX) East DE Anthony James (Texas A&M)Denton (TX) Guyer S Peyton Bowen (Notre Dame)Dickinson (TX) CB Vernon Glover Jr Odessa (TX) Permian OL Harris Sewell Klein (TX) Oak ATH Kaleb Black Katy (TX) CB Torik Aigbedion Waco (TX) Connally RB Tre Wisner Dallas (TX) South Oak Cliff CB Jayvon Thomas Suwanee (GA) North Gwinnett DL Kayden McDonald 2024'sHouston (TX) Clear Lake S Damani Maxson Dickinson (TX) CB Rodney Bimage Bellaire (TX) Episcopal WR Andre Thompson Tyler (TX) Tyler High RB Derrick McFall Buford (GA) DL KingJoseph Edwards Barbers Hill (TX) WR Trey Dixon Missouri City (TX) Ft Bend Hightower WR Zion Kearney Southlake (TX) Carroll TE Harrison Moore 2025'sConroe (TX) Grand Oaks WR Quanell X Farrakhan Jr Texas City (TX) ATH Xavier Skowron Pearland (TX) Dawson WR Chase Davis Houston (TX) Heights OL Devinn Farris Houston (TX) Heights DL Jordan Clavelle Bryan (TX) Rudder ATH Jaquise Martin College Stattion (TX) A&M Consolidated QB Will Hargett DeSoto (TX) RB Deondrae Riden
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.