Nathan Murphy

Offensive Lineman

6′5″ / 270 lbs

Bryan, TX

Bryan

Class of 2024

Rating: n/a

National Avg

Rating: n/a

School Preferences

Updates

3 yr ago by Ryan Brauninger

B/CS recruiting notes and a few 2023 names gaining steam in Houston

- A pair of College Station High standouts in OL Cory Hendrix and TE Houston Thomas backed away from their verbal commitments to Kansas yesterday. Thomas, who's currently at 6-5, 225 pounds, told me that he'll be coming to camp at Texas A&M this summer. Obviously, the Aggies have a stud tight end committed in Donovan Green. Will they want to take more than one? I can't say that for sure, but Thomas is a kid that I could see them taking a long look at if they decide to add another. I suspect his offer list will grow substantially regardless if A&M moves on him or not. Easily projectable athletic traits for a kid with his size and frame to add weight. - I'm also expecting to see 2024 Bryan OL Nathan Murphy at A&M camp this summer. It's still a long way out for that class, and Murphy is very raw, but he's got all the tools to be a highly recruited kid down the road. He's been one of the most impressive 2024's I've seen in my travels to date. - Lastly, I just wanted to put out a few names that have been hitting my radar quite a bit lately as the Aggies continue to identify prospects in the 2023 class. I don't know that any of these get offers in the near future, but I could certainly see that changing as I expect all of them to make it to camp this summer and perform in front of Jimbo Fisher and staff. Aldine Eisenhower CB Tyler Hutcherson - already holds a Tennessee offer. Smaller frame but can really move/cover. Houston Kinkaid ATH Micah Bell - has put up some solid track numbers this spring. LSU just offered this afternoon. Shadow Creek LB Scott Koumado - doesn't have varsity tape but does check a lot of boxes in terms of length, athleticism, and upside. Dickinson CB Vernon Glover Jr - great man coverage ability. Holds offers from Arkansas and Miami already.

Photos

(7 Total)

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”

Follow TexAgs