Jordan Moko
Status:
Uncommitted
JUNIOR COLLEGE
OL

Jordan Moko

Offensive Lineman
6′5″ / 320 lbs
Ephraim, UT
Snow College
Class of 2021
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: 89.0
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
Medium
LSU
Medium
Oregon
Medium
Arizona State
Low
Baylor
Low
California
Low
Central Florida
Low
Florida
Low
Iowa State
Low
Kansas State
Low
Maryland
Low
Missouri
Low
Oklahoma State
Low
Ole Miss
Low
Oregon State
Low
Rutgers
Low
Southern Miss
Low
TCU
Low
Tennessee
Low
Utah
Low
Washington State
Low
+ 16 More

Staff Predictions

?
Confidence
Prediction
Name & Date
Our staff hasn't made any predictions for Jordan Moko yet.

Videos

(1 Total)
Sneak Peak

Updates

Three Things: Denton Guyer-Cedar Hill, A&M's close in 2021 & more
8 days ago by Jason Howell
Three Things: Denton Guyer-Cedar Hill, A&M's close in 2021 & more
TexAgs senior recruiting analyst Jason Howell is back at it again with another round of his weekly recruiting thoughts, this week discussing the much-anticipated Guyer-Cedar Hill matchup this weekend as well as the Aggies continuing to close on the recruiting front.
Ryan Brauninger
2 mo ago by Ryan Brauninger
Quick OL recruiting note
Spoke to a source yesterday about A&M's pursuit of recently offered OL Jordan Moko out of Snow College in Utah. While the Aggies did just make a move with that offer, I was told this is a recruitment that Josh Henson has been working on for over 3 months now. I also found out Henson was set to speak with Moko at length yesterday afternoon. From what I've been able to gather, it seems like the 6-5, 330 pound Australian has been given a rather high priority by the A&M staff, and the Aggies have been able to scratch themselves into the discussion here. While many folks are thinking Moko stays out west, I do believe the allure of playing in the SEC is starting to become more appealing. Something to keep an eye on...
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.