Outside Hitter
6′1″
Madison, WI
Edgewood (Marquette)
Graduate
15:40
23 hrs ago by
Grace Nichter
Musgrove motors No. 8 A&M to sweep of Cal Poly
Setter Kirra Musgrove was all over the floor on Saturday night as she led the Aggie offense to a Saturday evening sweep of Cal Poly to wrap up the Texas A&M Invitational. With the victory, A&M improves to 3-2 with a perfect weekend at Reed Arena.
23 hrs ago by
Kay Naegeli
Kay's Takeaways: No. 8 Texas A&M 3, Cal Poly 0
No. 8 Texas A&M's offense was extremely efficient on Saturday night as the Aggies hit at a .333 clip en route to a sweep of Cal Poly inside Reed Arena. Setter Kirra Musgrove dished out 34 assists and recorded three aces, while outside hitter Natalie Ring racked up a season-best 15 kills.
22:27
1 day ago by
Richard Zane
Banner day at Reed sees Morrison's Aggies win twice
On the first day of the 2026 Texas A&M Invitational at Reed Arena, Jamie Morrison's No. 8 Aggie picked up victories over Grand Canyon and Arkansas State as the Maroon & White also celebrated their 2025 national title by unveiling a championship banner.
Kay's Takeaways: No. 8 Texas A&M 3, Arkansas State 0
For the first time in 2026, Texas A&M has swept a volleyball match as the eighth-ranked Aggies outclassed Arkansas State on Friday night at Reed Arena. By sweeping a doubleheader to open the Texas A&M Invitational, the Maroon & White are back to .500 on the young season.
2 days ago by
Kay Naegeli
Kay's Takeaways: No. 8 Texas A&M 3, Grand Canyon 1
Jamie Morrison and the eighth-ranked Fightin' Texas Aggies picked up their first victory of 2026 as the Maroon & White opened the Texas A&M Invitational by beating Grand Canyon at Reed Arena in four sets.
All Updates
8/26/2026
The Set: First Serve thoughts with Abby Benton of NumberOneVolleyball
8/23/2026
No. 8 Aggies suffer Sunday sweep in Milwaukee
8/21/2026
Stowers-less Aggies fall to No. 7 Louisville in four sets
8/20/2026
The Set: 2026 season preview with VolleyMind's Stephen Hinson
8/13/2026
Eliza Sharp part of a 'super powerful' group of attackers
8/11/2026
Natalie Ring provides different offensive 'superpowers' for A&M
4/17/2026
Amaré Hernandez can feel Aggie volleyball meshing this spring
4/16/2026
All-American Kyndal Stowers always striving for improvement
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.