Kicker
6′3″
/
200 lbs
Coppell, TX
Coppell
Junior (RS)
32:23
Rapid Reaction: Ags fall to 10th-ranked Rebels in 'had to have' contest
In a game that Jimbo Fisher & Co. desperately needed, the Aggies let a massive opportunity slip through their grasp in a 38-35 loss to No. 10 Ole Miss. With Texas A&M now at 5-4 overall, Billy Liucci and David Nuño sat down to react to another defeat.
TexAgs presents STACKED: Annual Report 2022
One year into the STACKED program, TexAgs presents our first annual report of how much has been brought in and paid out, as well as which athletes have been contracted. With over $500,000 already distributed to Texas A&M student-athletes, we are looking forward to 2023!
Best & worst moments from A&M's tumultuous 2022 football season
A 5-7 finish was unexpected for a Texas A&M team that entered 2022 ranked No. 6 in the nation. While the season was far from what the Aggies had hoped, the fall still produced a number of memorable moments in addition to plenty of forgettable ones.
By the Numbers: Texas A&M 38, LSU 23
After a memorable night at Kyle Field to close a disappointing 2022 season, Gabe Bock deep dives into the statistics from Texas A&M's 38-23 upset victory over Louisiana State in Aggieland.
By the Numbers: Texas A&M 20, Massachusetts 3
After a rainy and cold day spent at Kyle Field, Gabe Bock deep dives into the statistics from Texas A&M's 20-3 win over Massachusetts at Kyle Field.
All Updates
11/4/2023
Rapid Reaction: Ags fall to 10th-ranked Rebels in 'had to have' contest
4/8/2022
Seniors On JV, Episode 09: Texas A&M Specialists Caden Davis & Connor Choate
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.