Wide Receiver
6′4″
/
210 lbs
Ennis, TX
West Mesquite
Freshman (RS)
Ask Liucci, Part 2: A&M's CFP resume, push for early signing day & more
Texas A&M is off this week, but there is still plenty to talk about as the Aggies make their case for the playoff and look to round out their 2021 class. Billy Liucci answers another round of subscriber questions regarding all things Aggie football.
Offense in Review: Texas A&M 42, Arkansas 31
Billy Liucci revisits one of A&M's most dominant offensive showings in years, a 42-point effort against a Razorback defense that came to Kyle Field on a roll.
Aggies could feature some new faces following extra week of practices
The Aggies should be well-rested and healthier as the come off their bye week to face the Arkansas Razorbacks on Saturday night at Kyle Field. However, some changes to the Aggies' personnel could be coming as they return to action this weekend.
Chapman's loss is significant, but A&M embraces 'next man up' attitude
Caleb Chapman had nine receptions for 151 yards and two scores on Saturday against Florida, but unfortunately, he also suffered a season-ending injury late in the contest. Chapman's loss is significant, but A&M will look to turn to their other young receivers to make up for it.
Offense in Review: Alabama 52, Texas A&M 24
Missed opportunities ultimately defined the Aggies' offensive effort in Tuscaloosa. Billy Liucci breaks down an effort in which A&M moved the ball with regularity but too often failed to finish drives.
All Updates
9/9/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 1: Competition at wideout, young guys to watch & more
8/19/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 1: WR and S competitions, growth of Aggie sports & more
6/19/2020
Aggie Football 1-99: Breaking down jerseys numbers 81-90
5/27/2020
Jordan Pugh analyzes the 2020 Texas A&M wide receivers room
8/23/2019
Liucci: 2019 Fall Camp Superlatives
5/20/2019
Either/Or: Which A&M freshmen make the biggest impact in 2019
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.