Offensive Lineman
6′5″
/
323 lbs
North Richland Hills, TX
Birdville
Senior
11/14/2024
Analyzing different fronts with former Texas A&M OL coach Jim Turner
3/30/2021
John Harris discusses Aggies that can benefit most from a strong Pro Day
7/16/2020
30 Players in 30 Days #27 — Jared Hocker
6/12/2020
Aggie Football 1-99: Breaking down jerseys numbers 71-80
6/10/2020
Jordan Pugh analyzes the 2020 Texas A&M offensive line room
4/22/2020
Ask Liucci: Future first-rounders, Jimbo's offense, Jordan's Bulls & more
4/15/2020
Pseudo Spring Superlatives: Offensive Line
4/7/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 2: How players are adapting, top QBs in the nation & more
3/2/2020
TexAgs Topic Wheel: On-Field impact of 2021 Offensive Line recruiting
4/12/2019
By Position: Analyzing A&M's Offensive Line
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.