Wide Receiver
6′2″
/
190 lbs
Cedar Hill, TX
Cedar Hill
Graduate
9/24/2024
LiucciCast with Sean Porter: Cam Buckley joins the former player pod
4/7/2021
Skill Player Breakdown: Chris Taylor looks at Chapman & Buckley
9/9/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 1: Competition at wideout, young guys to watch & more
8/28/2020
Harris: Buckley's injury opens many new possibilities for A&M's offense
8/19/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 1: WR and S competitions, growth of Aggie sports & more
7/24/2020
30 Players in 30 Days #21 — Camron Buckley
6/25/2020
McGee looks at seniors poised for a breakout season in 2020
6/19/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 1: Previewing A&M's pass rush, Coley's recruiting impact & more
5/27/2020
Jordan Pugh analyzes the 2020 Texas A&M wide receivers room
8/31/2019
Omari Thomas breaks down his six top schools and switching to defensive tackle
7/26/2019
30 Players in 30 Days: #21 — Camron Buckley
5/2/2019
Swope's Spotlight: Texas A&M wideouts Kendrick Rogers & Camron Buckley
3/20/2019
By Position: Analyzing A&M's Wide Receivers and Tight Ends
7/31/2018
30 Players in 30 Days: #19 — Cam Buckley
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.