Offensive Lineman
6′4″
/
297 lbs
Mineola, TX
Sophomore
Spring Ball Report: A comprehensive look at A&M's Friday Night Lights
Texas A&M Football held its first public scrimmage of the spring last Friday, allowing fans and media to get a look at the team in action. Billy Liucci was on campus for the festivities and shared his thoughts in his third report on the Aggies' spring practices.
Spring Ball Report: Impressive newcomers, position battles and more
With ten practices in the books, Texas A&M is two-thirds of the way through the 2017 iteration of spring camp. Billy Liucci has kept his ear to the ground throughout and discusses standout performers, unit outlooks and more inside.
Spring Camp Five in Five: Players who could surprise
The Aggies began practices yesterday, and each day this week Billy will take you inside a different dynamic to watch this spring. The fourth of those five stories looks at players who could surprise and exceed expectations in 2017.
Ten Spring Storylines: Who and what I'm watching throughout camp
With significant personnel change coming on both sides of the ball, Spring Camp will tell us a lot about what to expect of the 2017 Aggies. Billy breaks down ten key dynamics, including the QB battle, dynamic newcomers, position changes, and much more.
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.
