Randy Bond
Texas A&M
#47
K

Randy Bond

Kicker
5′10″ / 190 lbs
Plano, TX
West
Sophomore

News Feed

By the Numbers: Texas A&M 38, LSU 23
11 days ago by Gabe Bock
By the Numbers: Texas A&M 38, LSU 23
After a memorable night at Kyle Field to close a disappointing 2022 season, Gabe Bock deep dives into the statistics from Texas A&M's 38-23 upset victory over Louisiana State in Aggieland.
Post Game Review: Texas A&M 38, No. 5 LSU 23
13 days ago by James Hernandez
Post Game Review: Texas A&M 38, No. 5 LSU 23
Behind Devon Achane's career-high 215 rushing yards and two touchdowns, A&M ruined No. 5 LSU's playoff hopes with a 38-23 upset victory at Kyle Field. While the Aggies are not going to a bowl game, the Maroon & White found a way to end the 2022 season on a high note.
By the Numbers: Texas A&M 20, Massachusetts 3
18 days ago by Gabe Bock
By the Numbers: Texas A&M 20, Massachusetts 3
After a rainy and cold day spent at Kyle Field, Gabe Bock deep dives into the statistics from Texas A&M's 20-3 win over Massachusetts at Kyle Field.
Post Game Review: Texas A&M 20, Massachusetts 3
20 days ago by James Hernandez
Post Game Review: Texas A&M 20, Massachusetts 3
For the first time since Sept. 24, Texas A&M has won a football game as the Aggies defeated the UMass Minutemen on a cold and wet afternoon at Kyle Field. Despite committing four turnovers, the Aggies kept the visitors out of the end zone.
By the Numbers: Auburn 13, Texas A&M 10
25 days ago by Gabe Bock
By the Numbers: Auburn 13, Texas A&M 10
Texas A&M's 2022 season will officially end in November after the Aggies failed to pull out a win on the road at Auburn, 13-10. Gabe Bock deep dives into the statistics from Saturday night's disappointing performance.
All Updates

Photos

(13 Total)
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.