Linebacker
6′1″
/
218 lbs
Cedar Hill, TX
Junior
Ten Spring Storylines: Who and what I'm watching throughout camp
With significant personnel change coming on both sides of the ball, Spring Camp will tell us a lot about what to expect of the 2017 Aggies. Billy breaks down ten key dynamics, including the QB battle, dynamic newcomers, position changes, and much more.
Defense in Review: Texas A&M 23, UTSA 10
Despite playing without all but one starter in the secondary, the Aggie defense looked more like the unit that will have to show up against LSU. Billy has ten defensive thoughts on the game.
No. 25 Texas A&M vs. UTSA: Key matchups and players to watch
Coming off of consecutive disappointing losses, Texas A&M is looking to rebound against UTSA. All that stands in their way are a few dynamic running backs and receivers and a dual-threat QB. The Aggie defense will have to step up in a big way on Saturday.
Texas A&M 45, Arkansas 24: Defense in Review
No need to be afraid of using the words "Wrecking Crew," as the Aggie defense showed it has the stuff on Saturday, stopping Arkansas nine times inside the two yard line and controlling Austin Allen and company.
21:08
30 Players in 30 Days: #19 — Richard Moore
At season's end last year, Richard Moore was arguably Texas A&M's best linebacker on the field. Now a sophomore, Moore looks to improve on his strong close to 2015 as he sees his role in John Chavis' defense increase.
All Updates
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.
