Defensive Lineman
6′5″
/
235 lbs
Houston, TX
Sophomore
Dissecting Disappointment: A&M-Mizzou, Part I
Whatever second chance the Aggies afforded their season with the Auburn win, they then squandered. A final look begins with a defense that found a new level of defenseless in the game's most pivotal moments.
Momentum M.O.: Aggies steamroll their way to 4-0
The quality of competition the last three weeks is less of a story than how A&M faced it. Undefeated, sitting on a quality road win and featuring emerging young talent, the Aggies head into SEC play as contenders.
Manifest Men: Aggies who will emerge in early season
The typical focal points are well known — new QB, stacked skill position talent, questions on defense. But what may alter the course of Texas A&M's season is the development of a second wave of key players.
Defense, newcomers surging in A&M's offseason
The University's second summer session is underway, as is the countdown to fall camp. With a summary of who has made waves and a look at what lies ahead, Liucci notes the offseason's key progress and players.
Coach's Scouting Report: Blinn C.C. DE Darrell Jackson
Texas A&M reached down the road for a last-minute addition to its 2014 class, bringing Jackson to campus. Thomas Rocco sends his DE off with a top review — and believes that he won't be a secret much longer.
All Updates
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.
