Running Back
6′0″
/
215 lbs
Pearland, TX
Junior (RS)
Offense in Review: Texas A&M 24, South Carolina 13
Kevin Sumlin made it clear he never takes wins for granted, but the South Carolina victory left the Aggies with some work to do offensively. With undefeated Tennessee headed to Kyle Field, Trevor Knight and company know they must improve.
Texas A&M 29, Auburn 16: Offense in Review
In a true SEC battle, the Aggies won the fight at the line of scrimmage. Steady movement in the middle of the field and big plays at crucial moments led to almost 500 yards of total offense against a talented Auburn defense.
Running bet: Aggies must excel on the ground to best Bruins
Poor rushing totals were a common denominator in Texas A&M's 2015 losses. Poor rushing defense was a common denominator in UCLA's 2015 losses. A&M must be the one to flip the script to leave Kyle with a win in the 2016 opener.
9:03
30 Players in 30 Days — #28: James White
After a disappointing 2015 campaign due in part to injuries, junior running back James White looks to rebound in 2016 and become the physical, punishing runner his body style dictates.
Texas A&M post-spring position outlook: Running back
Long gone are the days of Texas A&M relying on Tra Carson and little else. With the addition of Keith Ford and two stellar freshmen, the stable has been re-stocked — and the Aggies' primary concern entering the fall may only be exactly how to share the load.
All Updates
7/20/2016
30 Players in 30 Days — #28: James White
4/10/2015
VIDEO: Are You Ready? Discussing football topics with Billy Liucci
4/23/2014
Exclusive: Clarence McKinney details run game outlook
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.