Forums
Football
- News
- Schedule
- SEC Standings
- Roster
- Staff
- Class Breakdown
Recruiting
Sports
- Football
- Basketball
- Baseball
- Women's Basketball
- Soccer
- Softball
- Volleyball
Premium
Sponsors
- Sponsors
- Advertise With Us
United
More
- Podcasts
- Media
- TexAgs Live
- Post of the Day
- iOS App
- Search
- Store
- Pick-Off
- 12th Man Foundation
- Our Staff
- Contact Us
- Help Center

subscribe subscribe

| Register

Football

8-5 (5-3 SEC) | UR (CFP) UR (AP) UR (Coaches)

News Schedule Standings Roster Staff Class Breakdown

Texas A&M

#38

Jordan Mastrogiovanni

Linebacker

6′3″ / 250 lbs

Dallas, TX

Senior

AS A RECRUIT

Rating: n/a

National Avg

Rating: 89.6

News Feed

9 yr ago by Billy Liucci

That Which Awaits: Post-Signing Day thoughts, Part III

A foundation for the future laid, the Aggies move swiftly on to the 2016 class where they've already made a statement with their start. To cap it all off, Liucci forecasts future strengths, likely A&M targets and current team progress.

10 yr ago by Billy Liucci

Dissecting Disappointment: A&M-Mizzou, Part I

Whatever second chance the Aggies afforded their season with the Auburn win, they then squandered. A final look begins with a defense that found a new level of defenseless in the game's most pivotal moments.

10 yr ago by Billy Liucci

#21 Texas A&M vs. #7 Alabama: Key matchups

The Aggies and Tide have fought two brutal, thrilling battles since A&M's entrance into the SEC. Both enter the game searching for an identity — and how well they recover in recent problem areas will tell the story.

10 yr ago by Billy Liucci

Ole Miss 35, Texas A&M 20: Defense in review

Improvement is a mere moral victory and a debatable one at that, but there's no question the Aggie D gave the team every chance to win Saturday's game. The deficiencies are still clear — but they're far fewer.

Gut check facing A&M en route to Tuscaloosa

79:33

10 yr ago by Beau Holder

Gut check facing A&M en route to Tuscaloosa

The Aggies need answers in a hurry with a sobering stretch behind them and a familiar foe awaiting at the week's end. A&M's coaches and players gave an assessment of what's next in Tuesday's press conference.

All Updates

Videos

(4 Total)

Photos

(28 Total)

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Follow TexAgs