Nik Constantinou
Texas A&M
#95
P

Nik Constantinou

Punter
6′3″ / 225 lbs
Melbourne, Australia
Penleigh & Essendon
Graduate

News Feed

12 Key Statistics: Texas A&M 38, Abilene Christian 10
3 mo ago by Luke Evangelist
12 Key Statistics: Texas A&M 38, Abilene Christian 10
Taking a closer look at the Maroon & White's performance from Saturday's victory over Abilene Christian reveals plenty of interesting statistics and numbers to make note of. With the Aggies' home finale in the books, it's now time to dive into 12 stats from the game.
Post Game Review: Texas A&M 38, Abilene Christian 10
3 mo ago by Richard Zane
Post Game Review: Texas A&M 38, Abilene Christian 10
Behind interim head coach Elijah Robinson, Texas A&M earned their seventh and final victory at Kyle Field against Abilene Christian, 38-10, on Saturday afternoon. The Aggies outgained the FCS foe 448-242 with one final regular season game remaining.
12 Key Statistics: Texas A&M 51, Mississippi State 10
3 mo ago by Luke Evangelist
12 Key Statistics: Texas A&M 51, Mississippi State 10
Taking a closer look at the Maroon & White's performance from Saturday's victory over Mississippi State reveals plenty of interesting statistics and numbers to make note of. With the Aggies now bowl eligible, it's time to dive into 12 stats from the game.
12 Key Statistics: Ole Miss 38, Texas A&M 35
3 mo ago by Luke Evangelist
12 Key Statistics: Ole Miss 38, Texas A&M 35
Ole Miss got the best of Texas A&M on the road as Randy Bond's missed field goal in the final seconds fell short to seal the game for the Rebels. Now sitting at 5-4 and 3-3 in conference play, it's time to dive into 12 stats from the Aggie loss.
Post Game Review: No. 10 Ole Miss 38, Texas A&M 35
3 mo ago by Kay Naegeli
Post Game Review: No. 10 Ole Miss 38, Texas A&M 35
An anxiety-inducing finish resulted in disappointment as the road woes continue for Texas A&M after falling to No. 10 Ole Miss in the final seconds, 38-35. Despite breaking out offensively in the second half, Randy Bond's FG attempt to send the game to OT was tipped.
All Updates

Videos

(16 Total)
The Loochador Podcast: Back in win column by downing South Carolina
Lunch with Liucci: Billy Liucci joins TexAgs Radio (Monday, October 23)
Around Aggieland (8/25)
23 Players in 23 Days: #2 Ainias Smith
Around Aggieland (8/4)
Eric Galko highlights 12 Aggies named to East-West Shrine Bowl 1,000
Stephen McGee plays buy, sell, lease ahead of A&M's trip to Arlington
Around Aggieland (12/13)
Around Aggieland (12/10)
Around Aggieland (12/6)
Around Aggieland (9/24)
Around Aggieland (9/13)
Around Aggieland (8/20)
Around Aggieland (12/11)
Around Aggieland (12/4)
Aggie Football 1-99: Breaking down jerseys numbers 91-99

Photos

(32 Total)
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.