Forums
Football
- News
- Schedule
- SEC Standings
- Roster
- Staff
- Class Breakdown
Recruiting
Sports
- Football
- Basketball
- Baseball
- Women's Basketball
- Soccer
- Softball
- Volleyball
Premium
Sponsors
- Sponsors
- Advertise With Us
Stacked
More
- Podcasts
- Media
- TexAgs Radio
- Post of the Day
- Search
- Store
- Pick-Off
- Our Staff
- Contact Us
- Help Center

| Register

Football

5-7 (2-6 SEC) | UR (CFP) UR (AP) UR (Coaches)

News Schedule Standings Roster Staff Class Breakdown

Texas A&M

#95

NCAA

High School

Nik Constantinou

Punter

6′3″ / 225 lbs

Melbourne, Australia

Australia

Junior (RS)

News Feed

11 days ago by Gabe Bock

By the Numbers: Texas A&M 38, LSU 23

After a memorable night at Kyle Field to close a disappointing 2022 season, Gabe Bock deep dives into the statistics from Texas A&M's 38-23 upset victory over Louisiana State in Aggieland.

13 days ago by James Hernandez

Post Game Review: Texas A&M 38, No. 5 LSU 23

Behind Devon Achane's career-high 215 rushing yards and two touchdowns, A&M ruined No. 5 LSU's playoff hopes with a 38-23 upset victory at Kyle Field. While the Aggies are not going to a bowl game, the Maroon & White found a way to end the 2022 season on a high note.

18 days ago by Gabe Bock

By the Numbers: Texas A&M 20, Massachusetts 3

After a rainy and cold day spent at Kyle Field, Gabe Bock deep dives into the statistics from Texas A&M's 20-3 win over Massachusetts at Kyle Field.

25 days ago by Gabe Bock

By the Numbers: Auburn 13, Texas A&M 10

Texas A&M's 2022 season will officially end in November after the Aggies failed to pull out a win on the road at Auburn, 13-10. Gabe Bock deep dives into the statistics from Saturday night's disappointing performance.

27 days ago by Kay Naegeli

Post Game Review: Auburn 13, Texas A&M 10

Texas A&M fell to the bottom of the SEC West as the Aggies dropped their sixth-consecutive conference loss at Auburn, 13-10. The Tigers' 270 rushing yards throttled A&M's 94, and for the first time since 2008, the Ags are ineligible for a bowl game.

All Updates

Videos

(10 Total)

Photos

(23 Total)

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Follow TexAgs