Offensive Lineman
6′6″
/
335 lbs
Houston, TX
Junior (RS)
Cushing, Aggies finding recruiting success along the offensive line
Since his arrival in College Station, Texas A&M's new offensive line coach Adam Cushing has made a number of additions, both in the transfer portal and the high school ranks. With Mike Elko and Cushing leading the way, the future could be bright for the Maroon Goons.
Hop's Top 10 offensive linemen in Texas A&M program history
Between All-Americans and All-Pros, Texas A&M has had a history of producing great players along the offensive line. With standouts throughout the eras, David Sandhop lists his 10 best Maroon Goons to ever come through College Station.
Recruiting Battles: Texas A&M Aggies vs. Arkansas Razorbacks
Texas A&M and Arkansas have been going toe-to-toe on the recruiting trail for ages. Jason Howell takes a look at some of the recruiting battles that color the teams' current rosters and high-profile struggles of the past.
Truth in numbers: Scoring A&M's jump from the Big 12 to the SEC
Texas A&M is sending nine players to the NFL Combine. The ten-team Big 12 is sending just 18. As Olin Buchanan writes, this is just one more indication that the Aggies' move to the SEC has paid off in a big way.
NFL Draft Thoughts: Aggies, the SEC & the big picture
The three-day marathon that marks one of the high points of the NFL offseason is finally complete, and three Texas A&M draftees — along with a host of undrafted free agent Aggies — are off to realize their dream. What stood out, and what implications did the results carry?
All Updates
4/7/2016
John Harris details NFL Draft status of Ifedi, Williams, Matthews & more
2/25/2016
John Harris on Germain Ifedi, Cowboys/Texans draft outlook
8/27/2015
30 Players in 30 Days: #2 - Germain Ifedi
5/27/2014
30 Players in 30 Days: # 9 - Germain Ifedi
5/5/2014
Exclusive: Kevin Sumlin assesses spring results, Part I
4/25/2014
Exclusive: B.J. Anderson breaks down O-line prospects
2/18/2014
Spring storylines: Battle to Fill One Spot on Offensive Line
5/20/2013
30 Players in 30 Days: #20 Germain Ifedi
4/10/2013
Spring Game Preview: Breaking down A&M's roster with Evan Eike
3/21/2013
Spring Practice Highlights: Offensive line
8/15/2012
Personnel Anaylsis: A look into the A&M roster
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.