*** 2024 Aggie Softball Season Thread ***

126,320 Views | 1303 Replies | Last: 17 hrs ago by Boozer92
AGDAD14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How far in the outfield does the in-field fly rule apply? I've coached a lot of little league baseball and I'm very familiar with the rule. Just not sure how it is applied in softball.

Doesn't there have to be runners on first and second or first, second and third?

Also, I did not see a "tag" on the runner, who stepped on second base while "running" into the Florida player holding the ball on the base. Maybe my bad eyesight.

Shouldn't all officials monitoring the play be indicating to all players that the rule is being invoked?

Even the announcers seem a little flabbergasted by it all.

Extremely bad officiating and interpretation of the rule.
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Score
jmcfar_98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jt2hunt said:

Score


UF 11-3 final in 6
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SEC tournament schedule posted. We drew the night slot. Will play Miss St/USCe winner. Feel like we really need to win 2 at the tournament
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AGDAD14 said:

How far in the outfield does the in-field fly rule apply? I've coached a lot of little league baseball and I'm very familiar with the rule. Just not sure how it is applied in softball.

Doesn't there have to be runners on first and second or first, second and third?

Also, I did not see a "tag" on the runner, who stepped on second base while "running" into the Florida player holding the ball on the base. Maybe my bad eyesight.

Shouldn't all officials monitoring the play be indicating to all players that the rule is being invoked?

Even the announcers seem a little flabbergasted by it all.

Extremely bad officiating and interpretation of the rule.
A fair fly ball with less than two outs and a force in play at third and reasonably catchable with ordinary effort by any fielder that is an infielder including pitcher and catcher.

Is a judgment call with subjective criteria and therefore not reviewable.
1Aggie99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Problem with the infield fly rule is the call does not have to be audible. Pointing up and/or an audible "Infield Fly" are acceptable calls by rule. In this instance, the ump behind homeplate did point but assuming no verbal communication. A&M should have someone designated to watch for that but realistically that's a stupid expectation. Call was correct but it should be required to be announced physically (hand pointing up) and verbally (Infield Fly).

Other issue is coaching... runners have to know. If runner advancing to 2B would have simply remained there I'm pretty sure she would have been safe. It did not appear a tag was made prior to reaching the bag which would have been required with batter out on IF. Florida SS touched 2B and looked somewhat confused herself leading more to the non verbal call.
nereus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
An infield fly is an infield fly. Umpire signaling and calling that doesn't change if it is an infield fly or not. Umpires should (and are taught to) call it as early as they can by pointing in the air and vocally calling it (to make it clear to everyone that this is an infield fly). But if the umpires have a brain fart and forget about it during the play…it still should be called an infield fly afterwards. Players should be aware of the infield fly rule and act accordingly.

I wasn't able to watch this game so I don't really know what actually happened or how obvious/borderline the call was in this instance. Just pointing out that it is still an infield fly even it is isn't called in real time.
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Polls are out now

A&M ESPN 10 Coaches 9 D1 11 Softball America 10 RPI 16 KPI 12

As of today I would seed the field as follows

Still don't know how to make a table but the numbers following the team are poll average, rpi and kpi

1 Texas 1 1 1
2 Tenn 2.23 4 3
3 OK St 2.75 6 5
4 OU 4 2 2
5 Duke 5.5 3 4
6 UCLA 5.75 7 8
7 Stanford 7 8 6
8 Florida 8 10 7
9 LSU 11 5 10
10 Missouri 10.25 11 9
11 A&M 10 16 12
12 Ark 12.25 14 11
13 Georgia 13.75 9 13
14 Florida St 15.75 13 14
15 Wash 13 23 20
16 Louisiana 17 12 16
Virginia Tech 16.25 17 17
Miss St 17 22 18
Bama 21 15 15
Arizona 18.75 18 22

Top 7 seem a lock to be top 8 seed

Florida, LSU, Mizzou, A&M and Ark are very close and the outcome of SEC tournament games could influence which of those teams get the final spot in the top 8

Miss St knocking off A&M could put them in a position to get the final host spot. Bama is an odd one. They don't seem to have the resume but remain top 16 in both RPI and KPI so a run through LSU and Tenn could keep them alive. Louisiana is hanging by a thread and can't improve their standing.
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quad 1 wins for the schools I predicted

1 Texas 25-5
2 Tenn 25-8
3 OK St 18-5
4 OU 24-5
5 Duke 12-4
6 UCLA 16-9
7 Stanford 19-10
8 Florida 21-11
9 LSU 22-14
10 Missouri 19-13
11 A&M 20-11
12 Ark 18-13
13 Georgia 20-15
14 Florida St 7-8
15 Wash 9-11
16 Louisiana 14-15
Virginia Tech 7-7-1
Miss St 19-14
Bama 18-13
Arizona 11-13-1

Note the final 3 spots I chose have a losing record against Quad1 teams. This will also be an advantage for Bama and Miss St should they have a good SEC tournament
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.