quote:Good years. Glad I got to see it live.
Um, this was Wrecking Crew...
1991: 7th
1992: 9th
1993: 2nd
1994: 4th
1995: 3rd
Average: 5th
quote:Good years. Glad I got to see it live.
Um, this was Wrecking Crew...
1991: 7th
1992: 9th
1993: 2nd
1994: 4th
1995: 3rd
Average: 5th
Quote:
Call them the Wrecking Crew - there is nothing wrong with it. The WC moniker is not some Ouiji Board chant that we should fear. Get over yourselves and the idea that "back in the day" things were better. Enjoy what we have now.
Jack Cheese- I am really stingy with the title Wrecking Crew, but the more we get into this season, and the more I think about it, the more I believe this, not statistics, should be the criteria. I was there for the great seasons of the WC. This team embodies that attitude and production- and in some ways more so.Jack Cheese said:
WC is about attitude, disruption, tackling, physicality, and dictating the game to the opponent. This year's defense is closer in each of those respects to the old WC than any in recent memory.
This. My ass is yelling Wrecking Crew at the game Saturday. The defense and Chief have earned it.zmurda said:
Let's just hold on to that 12 spot....would be fitting.
WC is back holmes
schmellba99 said:
Jeebus, some of you actively find ways to be miserable about things. And many of you commenting were still crapping your diapers when the original WC defenses swarmed the field. Amazing.
Wrecking Crew is not some type of strategic weapon that we develop, spend all kinds of money on, then toss in storage and use only as a political bargaining chip - there is no need to act like that. At this point in time, the defense is playing lights out. We have held opponents to low scores and we are undefeated - and the defense playing the way that they have played is a key component of those facts.
Yards don't matter - this isn't 1993 when offenses were built around the vestiges of the wishbone offense and running the ball was king. Time of possession really doesn't matter. Yards per play really doesn't matter. What does matter is points - and we simply are playing at a level right now that prevents the other team from scoring many of them. That means wins. Points and wins - those matter.
Call them the Wrecking Crew - there is nothing wrong with it. The WC moniker is not some Ouiji Board chant that we should fear. Get over yourselves and the idea that "back in the day" things were better. Enjoy what we have now.
tk for tu juan said:
If you hold the pointer finger of your left hand next to "C" of the wrecking crew hand sign, a backwards "p" is formed.
WOLFPACK
Amenschmellba99 said:
Jeebus, some of you actively find ways to be miserable about things. And many of you commenting were still crapping your diapers when the original WC defenses swarmed the field. Amazing.
Wrecking Crew is not some type of strategic weapon that we develop, spend all kinds of money on, then toss in storage and use only as a political bargaining chip - there is no need to act like that. At this point in time, the defense is playing lights out. We have held opponents to low scores and we are undefeated - and the defense playing the way that they have played is a key component of those facts.
Yards don't matter - this isn't 1993 when offenses were built around the vestiges of the wishbone offense and running the ball was king. Time of possession really doesn't matter. Yards per play really doesn't matter. What does matter is points - and we simply are playing at a level right now that prevents the other team from scoring many of them. That means wins. Points and wins - those matter.
Call them the Wrecking Crew - there is nothing wrong with it. The WC moniker is not some Ouiji Board chant that we should fear. Get over yourselves and the idea that "back in the day" things were better. Enjoy what we have now.
Quote:
Now this may be a bit of an exaggeration, but I seem to remember the 2001 defense scoring more touchdowns than the Mark Farris lead offense.
They aren't thge wrecking crew yet, all you who claim so weren't a twinkle in your fathers eye at that time.John Francis Donaghy said:
For all the posters that have been going on and on about how this defense is nowhere near the old Wrecking Crew days under RC Slocum, and how our defense would have to be consistently in the top 5 to earn the moniker back, I decided to do a little fact checking.
I looked up A&M's national scoring defense rankings for every year of Slocum's tenure. I chose scoring defense because at the end of the day, all that really matters is keeping points off the board. So I figured that was the most appropriate standard to use.
Scoring Defense:
1989: 9th
1990: 28th
1991: 7th
1992: 9th
1993: 2nd
1994: 4th
1995: 3rd
1996: 38th
1997: 16th
1998: 10th
1999: 19th
2000: 10th
2001: 13th
2002: 42nd
Average: 15th
2016 so far: 12th
So really, the current defense is statistically on par with the average Slocum defense, and the only period that was significantly ahead of where we are now was the 3 season stretch from 1993 to 1995 when our defense was in the top 5. Those were also the only top 5 scoring defenses Slocum fielded as a head coach.
And if you consider the difference in schedule strength between the old SWC and our current SECW slate, and the fact that 75% of this season's games that have gone into that current ranking were against UCLA, Auburn, and Arkansas, while most of the teams ahead of us have played 2-4 cupcakes so far to help pad their stats, and that #18 ranking starts to look even more impressive.
I know that as we get older, our younger selves become cooler and more handsome, and the girls we "dated" get prettier and prettier in our memories, and the football team we remember becomes increasingly fearsome, but when you get down to brass tacks, the numbers show we are looking at what would have been considered a standard Wrecking Crew defense back during Slocum's tenure.
Give the players what they've earned.
WRECKING CREW