Whoa there.....can you back that up with some evidence?TAG12 said:I was wondering why people are still supporting him. You didn't read the posts because you don't want to hear the truth?YellAg2004 said:
I got the same message and immediately unsubscribed. I haven't read the last 3 emails they've sent. It's disappointing that they've lost their way on their original purpose (defeating SMDs) and have gotten down into the mud with every other PAC.
How can you advocate for someone to be on the BOT who has defrauded banks by selling collateral, defaulted on forbearance agreements in order to buy a $1M house, has engaged in theft and even vandalizing his ex-employer's equipment? This isn't slander, it's the truth. He did these things.
Ignorance is bliss, I guess.
SBISD School Board Elections
11,122 Views |
87 Replies |
Last: 5 hrs ago by lb sand
This is where Slattery lost me. If you have people like Spring Branch Dems, the Harris County Democrat party and AFT endorsing you...you should have said at the time, under no circumstances do I want any of those misfit toys' endorsements.AggieMom24 said:
Facts:
Slattery was absolutely supported by Democrats last race. They phone banked for him and hint, hint, told you who NOT to vote for and by golly, it was the conservative candidates in the race.
And he has several Democrats on his endorsement page now.
Anyone can read between the lines and recognize who Democrats wanted to win and want to win this race.
And sounds like you have never served on an SBISD District Committee. Otherwise, you would agree that they are pretty much a waste of time. The district does what it wants.
"Many founding members of PIPEline" You mean one or two and the majority supported John in his HD133 race because he was a valuable and hardworking SBISD Trustee.
But he didn't....and that's a problem.
Absolutely. It's all right here https://www.savesbisd.org/blog
Slattery bots- ASSEMBLE!!!!
He has refuted all of that.
lol. I do not recall seeing a single statement from him in 2022 when those endorsements dropped. And that's a major problem. If you nod along while Randi Weingarten's union endorses you….you deserve to be nowhere near a school board.TAG12 said:
He has refuted all of that.
It's hard to see what you aren't looking for. Read the articles on SaveSBISD and tell me why they shouldn't be taken into consideration when deciding who to vote for.
Who's troll are you? You have a grand total of 9 posts on Texags.TAG12 said:
It's hard to see what you aren't looking for. Read the articles on SaveSBISD and tell me why they shouldn't be taken into consideration when deciding who to vote for.
As an example of who Slattery is, consider this:
Following the 2020 and 2022 board election sweeps, a 501c4 called SOMOS was stood up. It's basically a group of all the worst people you would never want near a school board: young liberal activists trying to race hustle.
Last week SOMOS held a "candidate forum" so they could ask all the candidates about their liberal bona fides. Of course Ben Drews showed up to assumedly talk about "book bans" and trans kids.
Cone ignored the invitation from the activist group, as he should have, and didn't show.
Slattery responded and said he would try to make it…and is now apologizing for no-showing.
Again, that's the problem with Slattery. Groups like SOMOS deserve nothing but disdain and Slattery is apologizing to them.
Following the 2020 and 2022 board election sweeps, a 501c4 called SOMOS was stood up. It's basically a group of all the worst people you would never want near a school board: young liberal activists trying to race hustle.
Last week SOMOS held a "candidate forum" so they could ask all the candidates about their liberal bona fides. Of course Ben Drews showed up to assumedly talk about "book bans" and trans kids.
Cone ignored the invitation from the activist group, as he should have, and didn't show.
Slattery responded and said he would try to make it…and is now apologizing for no-showing.
Again, that's the problem with Slattery. Groups like SOMOS deserve nothing but disdain and Slattery is apologizing to them.
It's strange that you and others in this forum care about how many posts someone has, like that could invalidate or substantiate any claims made here.Marvin_Zindler said:
As an example of who Slattery is, consider this:
Following the 2020 and 2022 board election sweeps, a 501c4 called SOMOS was stood up. It's basically a group of all the worst people you would never want near a school board: young liberal activists trying to race hustle.
Last week SOMOS held a "candidate forum" so they could ask all the candidates about their liberal bona fides. Of course Ben Drews showed up to assumedly talk about "book bans" and trans kids.
Cone ignored the invitation from the activist group, as he should have, and didn't show.
Slattery responded and said he would try to make it…and is now apologizing for no-showing.
Again, that's the problem with Slattery. Groups like SOMOS deserve nothing but disdain and Slattery is apologizing to them.
Slattery has not apologized to that group, nor does he intend to. You're right though... he would not show anyone disdain. That's not who he is. So if you want to write him off for that, then fine.
An Aggie does not lie, cheat or steal or tolerate those who do. That rules out Matt Cone.
No one here agrees with Ben Drews platform, so he's out.
I suspect you'll be casting your vote for Ronald, unless you're able to compromise with your moral convictions.
Lol. No buddy. I'm even more excited to cast my vote for Cone now because of your presence in this thread.TAG12 said:It's strange that you and others in this forum care about how many posts someone has, like that could invalidate or substantiate any claims made here.Marvin_Zindler said:
As an example of who Slattery is, consider this:
Following the 2020 and 2022 board election sweeps, a 501c4 called SOMOS was stood up. It's basically a group of all the worst people you would never want near a school board: young liberal activists trying to race hustle.
Last week SOMOS held a "candidate forum" so they could ask all the candidates about their liberal bona fides. Of course Ben Drews showed up to assumedly talk about "book bans" and trans kids.
Cone ignored the invitation from the activist group, as he should have, and didn't show.
Slattery responded and said he would try to make it…and is now apologizing for no-showing.
Again, that's the problem with Slattery. Groups like SOMOS deserve nothing but disdain and Slattery is apologizing to them.
Slattery has not apologized to that group, nor does he intend to. You're right though... he would not show anyone disdain. That's not who he is. So if you want to write him off for that, then fine.
An Aggie does not lie, cheat or steal or tolerate those who do. That rules out Matt Cone.
No one here agrees with Ben Drews platform, so he's out.
I suspect you'll be casting your vote for Ronald, unless you're able to compromise with your moral convictions.
You are not helping your candidate by being a keyboard warrior.
Good for you. Have fun in your little echo chamber.
Will do. I think you're now at your post limit for the day.TAG12 said:
Good for you. Have fun in your little echo chamber.
BSD said:
Lololol
I'm not one to object to negative campaigning, but that's a ridiculous reach. Oh, and sending unsolicited political text messages should be a felony offense.
I appreciate ya'lls debate. All of the SaveSBISD slander is resolved litigation that often comes with being an effective business owner. These hit pieces do not provide the full truth. Matt has the bandwidth and has been in the fight alongside other Trustees for the past two years to get the necessary funding for our district.
Please feel free to call Matt to discuss any & all concerns you may have. He is the true grassroots conservative we need on the board to fight for our students, teachers & schools. With two young boys in school, he has a true pulse of what is occurring.
Please feel free to call Matt to discuss any & all concerns you may have. He is the true grassroots conservative we need on the board to fight for our students, teachers & schools. With two young boys in school, he has a true pulse of what is occurring.
Why in the world is this such a contested election for a school board position?
Are they all like this and I've just missed it?
Are they all like this and I've just missed it?
Tex117 said:
Why in the world is this such a contested election for a school board position?
Are they all like this and I've just missed it?
I was thinking the same thing today. These people aren't getting paid (much if anything). Being on School
Board doesn't exactly jumpstart a political career. So it's basically just people trying to serve their oversized egos.
Looks like slattery pulled out a win.
https://www.springbranchisd.com/news/read-more/~board/sbisd-post-board/post/spring-branch-isd-unofficial-election-results-may-4-2024
https://www.springbranchisd.com/news/read-more/~board/sbisd-post-board/post/spring-branch-isd-unofficial-election-results-may-4-2024
Featured Stories
See All
5:53
3h ago
936
9:10
4h ago
1.0k
Rapid Reaction: No. 1 Texas A&M drops series in Baton Rouge
by David Sandhop
6:15
12h ago
1.6k
7:30
5h ago
757
#15 Aggies advance to super regionals after dispatching Toreros
by Luke Evangelist
30:01
1d ago
2.1k
Maroon&Fight
FINAL from Baton Rouge: Louisiana State 6, No. 1 Texas A&M 4 (Saturday)
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
4
Aldo the Apache
Why is it taboo to mention concerns with A&M sports?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
3