It was so bad. The most entertaining part was the hour after when my son and I laughed and retold the really bad parts to each other.
quote:Ummmm no. the movie has tanked.
Theyll make more crap like this. Because you guys will go, no matter what.
quote:Normally I'd agree, but this has made $342 million worldwide. I think there is a chance this will end up a trilogy (and please let it die there).quote:Ummmm no. the movie has tanked.
Theyll make more crap like this. Because you guys will go, no matter what.
Only $99 million so far and falling fast. Never was #1. Now out of the top 10.
quote:Ha, I thought the same thing. Data was the only person who was interesting.
Movie was Charles Barkley Turrible.
Best acting in the movie was done by Commander Data.
quote:Uhhhh.....NO.
It's doing better than Ghostbusters right?
quote:quote:Normally I'd agree, but this has made $342 million worldwide. I think there is a chance this will end up a trilogy (and please let it die there).quote:Ummmm no. the movie has tanked.
Theyll make more crap like this. Because you guys will go, no matter what.
Only $99 million so far and falling fast. Never was #1. Now out of the top 10.
quote:How does that math work?
Both are really box office busts. Given production budgets in the $150-$165 million range and distribution costs of another $75-$100 million (low end) they needed to make $450-$500 million or more to break even.
quote:the theaters keep roughly 50% of what a movie makes at the box office - thats a very average number but gives you a good idea. in reality the studios get like 80-90% in the first week or 2 and then a sliding scale percentage that decreases over time - so movies with a long run mean theaters make more money over time. but it's ana average.quote:How does that math work?
Both are really box office busts. Given production budgets in the $150-$165 million range and distribution costs of another $75-$100 million (low end) they needed to make $450-$500 million or more to break even.