self driving car accidents

6,546 Views | 126 Replies | Last: 8 yr ago by Guitarsoup
AggieFrog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Highly doubtful in less than a decade. Some will exist most likely but there's a ton of inertia, regulatory issues, insurance issues, etc. to overcome.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
High end Teslas can already self drive on highways, but just need the software patched to activate the feature. It's a lot closer than people think. It's already legal, though there will obviously be some court cases, but it is so much safer, I think we'll see very rapid adoption that is heavily supported by insurance companies and regulatory agencies.
et98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've read hundreds of hours worth of articles, essays, and predictions on autonomous cars. For some reason, i love this topic and am totally obsessed with it. Just about every question or concern people have has been addressed. There was a thread on the politics board a few months ago on this subject where I gave my thoughts based on what I've read over the past year or two, posted a few links, & paraphrased a lot of what they had to say.

quote:
17 Ways Driverless Cars Could Change America
How Driverless Cars Could Reshape Cities
How Will Driverless Cars Affect Our Cities


The 3 links posted above highlight a lot of what to expect in a society with with autonomous cars. Keep in mind that they all assume driverless cars will kill the car culture and car ownership in general. Driverless cars will be similar to Uber & taxis.

They're a long read, but they're interesting. There's even a detailed description of how intersections will work without traffic lights or stop signs, including a computer generated model of a 12-lane, 4-way intersection. They make both good and bad points, some of which are included below (paraphrased):

Fewer Car Wrecks:
Speeding, DUI, & distracted driving, road rage, drowsiness, texting, etc make up the vast majority of wrecks which cost millions in damages and kill thousands each year. These, along with all other driver-error wrecks will be eliminated.

Cars Will Look Completely Different:
Since wrecks will be few & far between, safety features like seat belts, air bags, & reinforced walls will be less important or nonexistent. Drivers won't have to see or signal to other drivers, so windshields & wipers, turn signals, and headlights will be unnecessary. Steering wheels, gear shifts, speedometer, & forward-facing seats won't exist. The A/C, radio, & GPS won't need to be located in the front-center of the car any longer because they won't need to be within arm's reach of a driver.

Multi-Tasking & Multi-Functionality:
Specialty vehicles similar to RV's will be more common. Vehicles with fully-functioning work spaces/offices will be available. The vehicle a family uses to travel on vacation may essentially be a living room on wheels. Workout nuts could use a vehicle with a stationary bike on board.

Different Road Design & Rules:
No road signs. No stop lights. No lanes. Narrower highways because computers are more efficient than human drivers. Narrower streets because street parking will no longer exist. No universal speed limits. Each car will have its own speed limit based on its own capabilities within each and every driving condition it's facing at that exact time (weather conditions, road curvature, road surface, traffic congestion, etc).

Effects on Kids, Disabled, Heavily Medicated, Elderly, Non-English Speakers, & Intoxicated:
All of these groups can transport themselves in an automated car. The drinking age being lowered and legalization of drugs will be more plausible as well.

Increased Urban Sprawl & Telecommuting:
Commutes won't take as long. Sleeping & working during your commute will be normal in the future although it's dangerous & difficult (almost impossible) now. That means living further from work will be more practical. It could also result in shorter days at the office.

Buildings & Parking Will Be "Uncoupled":
We'll still need parking lots; we just won't need them anywhere near buildings. Everyone will be dropped off at their destination, and the car will then leave to go pick up someone else. No on-site parking required. As much as 1/3 of land in many cities is devoted to parking spots, and almost all of that land is immediately adjacent to buildings. This very valuable land will become parks, pedestrian zones, and commercial areas. Cities without onsite parking will be denser and more walkable. Shopping malls & big box stores that currently require far more parking area than actual floor space will be able to go into any area they're needed, not just where they fit. Low-value land far away from commercial & residential areas will be the new consolidated parking areas, which means more efficient use of land.

More Efficient Use of Time:
In addition to the hundreds of hours saved per person due to mulitasking during the commute (sleeping, working, exercising, etc), we won't have to drive kids around as much. We'll run very few errands because most stuff will be delivered by driverless cars. In business districts, 30% of time driving is currently spent looking for a parking spot which results in an estimated one billion miles driven per year.

Bigger Houses, Bigger Yards, More Affordability:
Current homes won't need their garage or drive ways. Narrower streets (due to reduced street parking) will mean bigger yards for new homes. Narrower streets and reduced parking requirements in newly built planned communities will result in more houses per acre than existing communities, which results in a larger supply of houses & more affordability. Existing homeowners will combat this drop in pricing by converting their garage to an extra room and their driveway to extra yard space. Long commutes being more practical will result in people moving out of town to where larger lots and houses are more economically feasible.

Revolutionizing Law Enforcement:
Greater access to GPS data will help law enforcement. (I don't know if this is good or bad).
Resources will be redeployed from traffic violations, drunk driving prosecution, and speed traps to more intentional crimes. Or perhaps police forces can be reduced. But police & emergency vehicles may still have to use human drivers or at least a way to override driverless cars so they can get through traffic easier/quicker.

Elimination of speed traps and traffic citations could hurt local communities, though, who depend on that for revenue. Traffic stops also tend to lead to arrests for more serious crimes such as felony warrants.

Vulnerability to Terrorism and Natural Disasters:
Cars aren't currently a target by terrorists because they can easily disperse and are separately controlled unlike subways and planes. But when driverless cars are controlled by the same satellite system, they suddenly become a high profile target. Additionally, a major earthquake or a hurricane like Katrina could knock out the entire transportation system when it's needed most.

Loss of Privacy:
The open road and a full tank of gas used to mean freedom and anonymity. But in a GPS tracked network of driverless cars, it will mean the exact opposite.

quote:
I think within 10 years, they will be at least as common as electric & hybrid cars are today. By 2030, "normal" cars will be rare. Once kids who've always lived with driverless cars are able to purchase cars of their own (30 years from now), the age of "normal cars" will officially end.

Frankly, driverless cars will be superior to normal cars in every way, and the only people who will disagree will be old people like us. I think the smart phone analogy used earlier is a good example. While there will always be some old farts who refuse to give up their land-line and rolodex, 99.9999% of the population believe smart phones are superior.

I also agree with the poster who said driverless cars will replace Uber & taxis. Once driverless cars take over the marketplace, there will be no reason to own a car. Since we'll no longer drive, "car culture" will be a thing of the past. The looks of the car and how you look riding in it only matter because you're driving. Since you won't drive in the future, none of that will matter in the future, which means owning cars won't matter to people either.

I expect that we'll have several car services to subscribe to, and we'll pay a monthly bill to each service based on the time/miles we traveled and the types of vehicles we used. Cars, pickups, and vans will all have different rates.

I think ride sharing and carpooling will be much more common. If another person lives on the way to your destination and is headed somewhere else along the way, the computer can alert you and ask if you're willing to pick the person up. Perhaps you will receive a discount on your service as compensation. Of course, you'll have the option of declining. Maybe it will be a preference setting you can select before you ever even call for the car.

Companies may own their own driverless cars or have their own subscriptions for their employees who must drive for work. Perhaps a subscription (for commuting to & from work) would be a perk they could offer employees similar to how we get health insurance now.

Without car ownership, things like driveways, garages, parking lots, parking garages, Jiffy Lubes, gas stations, and neighborhood mechanic shops will be a thing of the past. That land will all be repurposed for other things like an extra room on the house, a bigger yard, parks, and other buildings.

Cars on average are actually used less than 4% of the time. Think about how much space is wasted by cars just sitting around not being driven. That's probably millions of acres of land just being wasted. That will now all be reclaimed for more useful things.

Intersections will also be a thing of the past. The computers & GPS devices on board each car will communicate with the other cars, and they'll navigate the intersection in coordinated fashion without stopping or barely even slowing down. Traffic will simply move through each other without bumping into each other in the exact same way schools of fish swim through each other without touching.

Most studies estimate that 4 times as many cars will fit on current highways once they're all automated because human inefficiency & having to guess what everyone else is doing will no longer be an issue. So the streets & highways will be narrower, and turn lanes will not need to exist.

Driverless cars will also save time for us all. We can work, sleep, shop online, surf the web, research stuff, do homework, and nearly anything else in the car. Redundant driving (driving for the sole purpose of transporting someone or something else) would no longer exist. In other words, your kids can take themselves to soccer practice, your groceries can be delivered to your house, and your blind grandmother can go to her doctor's appointment while you sit on the couch.

One of the down sides are that public transportation will lose its value. It will result in a MORE cars on the road per capita at any one time. But again, roads will be more efficient, so roads at their current size will be able to accommodate far more cars...so travel time may not be affected that much.

Lots of people will lose their jobs, too. Taxi drivers, neighborhood mechanics, valets, parking attendants, and car salesmen will cease to exist. But new industries will spring up to support driverless cars.

Over-commercialization of the riding experience will be impossible to overcome. I think advertisers will bombard riders with ads and commercials. Of course, for a fee, you can probably get rid of the ads in much the same way websites work today.

And for those of you who say it can't happen because GPS is inaccurate, you need to stop looking at the technology as it is now, and start looking at it as it will be soon. Of course it isn't perfect right now, but those glitches will be solved in due time.
et98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We also have to keep in mind WHEN autonomous car technology is coming into existence. It's occurring simultaneously with the advance of GPS-navigated drone technology, & 3-D printing. All 3 of these revolutionary technologies will affect our lives drastically and are all converging at the same time.

3-D printing will result in a more automated manufacturing & construction industries. This will funnel talent & manpower to the service industries. In other words, many predict that we'll stop paying people to BUILD stuff for us and start paying them DO stuff for us...such as running errands. When you add delivery drone technology and autonomous delivery vehicles, the need to run errands will likely not exist in the future at all.

With Wi-Fi technology continuing to advance, telecommuting will continue to become more and more effective & efficient. As the "old school" managers & business owners die off and the next generation take over, working remotely will become the norm. Rush hour won't affect us on the same level that it does now per capita.
AggieFrog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
We also have to keep in mind WHEN autonomous car technology is coming into existence. It's occurring simultaneously with the advance of GPS-navigated drone technology, & 3-D printing. All 3 of these revolutionary technologies will affect our lives drastically and are all converging at the same time.

3-D printing will result in a more automated manufacturing & construction industries. This will funnel talent & manpower to the service industries. In other words, many predict that we'll stop paying people to BUILD stuff for us and start paying them DO stuff for us...such as running errands. When you add delivery drone technology and autonomous delivery vehicles, the need to run errands will likely not exist in the future at all.

With Wi-Fi technology continuing to advance, telecommuting will continue to become more and more effective & efficient. As the "old school" managers & business owners die off and the next generation take over, working remotely will become the norm. Rush hour won't affect us on the same level that it does now per capita.

A lot of those articles from the first topic won't be applicable for a few decades if ever. Way too many manual cars already in circulation to make most of those drastic changes anytime soon.

As for telecommuting that's a negative in my book. I'm in IT and have been an early adopter for a couple of decades now but find working remotely to be an awful experience compared to actually being in an office.

I think we as a society need to think through whethr the coming automation is something we truly want. There are positives to be had, no doubt, but there are also numerous negatives and profound changes coming that we're woefully unprepared for.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a tech leap, like the introduction of the automobile to the mass market, or commercial air travel. The improvement in every way is so objectively better than our current system, and there is such public safety at stake, that the adoption will be very rapid.

The market will eventually make it unbearable to drive your own car. Think auto insurers will be stoked to give you a policy for your manual drive car when even 15-20% of the cars on the road are auto drive and will therefore never be at fault in a collsion? When the body of safety stats fills out, the government will also use incentives to get people into auto drive cars; cash for clunkers 2.0. Cities will charge greater tolls to enter in manual cars because of the congestion they cause, and charge more on tolled highways because they take up more road.

Some of the suggested items will take 100% adoption, for sure. That is a ways off, but it's not the far future, barring some sort of massive disaster.
chipotle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Some of the suggested items will take 100% adoption, for sure. That is a ways off, but it's not the far future, barring some sort of massive disaster.


"ISIS hacks Google, directs thousands of cars into Lake Michigan"
AggieFrog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
The improvement in every way is so objectively better than our current system, and there is such public safety at stake, that the adoption will be very rapid.

I can't necessarily agree with this. Some automation, yes. Complete automation I personally am not looking forward to.

There's a limit to how much automation of everything is good for us. I fear how society handles the lack of work - idleness of the vast majority of the populace will not be a good thing. Not to mention how even more dependent people become on machines and algorithms rather than having independent thought.

It also has the potential to be like throwing gasoline on the inequality issues already simmering.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Full car automation does not equal idleness. Some jobs will be reduced, and others will emerge.

It would be foolish to deliberately restrain progress in efficiency and safety just to preserve some sort of societal "good for us" norm. Who decides what is good enough for us and what is left behind?

At the end of the day, you'll have verified safety records, better energy efficiency, and other hard stats against a "good for us" ideal. That will be a tough sell.
benMath08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
...
It also has the potential to be like throwing gasoline on the inequality issues already simmering.
To me, this will be the biggest obstacle to overcome.

There are many professions who will be hit hard. We'll still need mechanics, obviously, but far fewer of them. Taxi drivers will be out of a job. I'm unsure that all of the major auto manufacturers will make it through unscathed as well once cars are effectively commodotized.

All of these people will need work and may find that their skills are no longer relevant. We can't just put them on the street.
AggieFrog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Full car automation does not equal idleness. Some jobs will be reduced, and others will emerge.

Car automation is just a piece of the automation puzzle. Many, many other industries will also undergo similar transitions. And mostly in white collar and service industries not yet greatly affected by it.

Yes, some jobs may be created... eventually. But there may be a period of time (maybe even a decade or two) that have the potential to be pretty ugly.

I'm involved in task automation and simplification. There are definitely pros and cons. The cons being that the more that is automated, the fewer folks who truly understand how the system works or even when there might be problems. In some ways it dumbs people down because they don't think as much.

And, as someone who works with large, complex systems I find it hard for anyone to say that automated cars have been perfected given the issues I see daily from some of the top software systems in the world and the issues we find regularly with general release code. These car systems likely do well in sunny day scenarios. But I have a hard time believing that the complex testing in all the varieties of weather conditions, random events (such as deer crossings, 4 way stops with human drivers, etc.), hardware / software malfunctions, upgrades, sensor issues over time, all the varieties of roads and their conditions, etc. to say we're ready to put tens of millions of automated vehicles on the roads in <10 years.
Coppell97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think we may be 30 years away from a lot of the stuff being described . . .
et98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
As for telecommuting that's a negative in my book. I'm in IT and have been an early adopter for a couple of decades now but find working remotely to be an awful experience compared to actually being in an office.
Since you've been in IT for a couple of decades, I assume you're at least in your mid-to-upper 40's? Assuming it takes 20 years to convert to a fully-automated society, you will be in your upper 60's and approaching retirement if you hadn't already arrived. Most companies in 2035 will be run by people who are currently in their 20's & 30's, and many will have lived in a relatively automated society for most of their adult lives. Telecommuting will not replace office work, but it will be far more "normal" and accepted by corporate decision makers.

And as far as early adoption, autonomous cars will receive their greatest support from the very group that is normally the greatest detractor of technological adoption...senior citizens. They'll be the biggest proponents of the technology out of necessity. And when you consider the timing once again, you realize the Baby Boomers will be in their 70's & 80's. They'll have money...they'll have the need...and they'll be the largest age demographic in US history.
AggieFrog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
As for telecommuting that's a negative in my book. I'm in IT and have been an early adopter for a couple of decades now but find working remotely to be an awful experience compared to actually being in an office.
Since you've been in IT for a couple of decades, I assume you're at least in your mid-to-upper 40's? Assuming it takes 20 years to convert to a fully-automated society, you will be in your upper 60's and approaching retirement if you hadn't already arrived. Most companies in 2035 will be run by people who are currently in their 20's & 30's, and many will have lived in a relatively automated society for most of their adult lives. Telecommuting will not replace office work, but it will be far more "normal" and accepted by corporate decision makers.

And as far as early adoption, autonomous cars will receive their greatest support from the very group that is normally the greatest detractor of technological adoption...senior citizens. They'll be the biggest proponents of the technology out of necessity. And when you consider the timing once again, you realize the Baby Boomers will be in their 70's & 80's. They'll have money...they'll have the need...and they'll be the largest age demographic in US history.

I'm 37 but have been on the net for 22 years, had a internet enabled phone since 2000, etc.

Baby Boomers (the early ones) are already pushing 70. Some will adopt these cars but the biggest push will likely come from the Millenials.

Barring regulatory or insurance changes in 20+ years I bet cars maintain some manual mode for a long time to come.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Watched Hot Tub Time Machine 2 yesterday and thought of this thread. It's 2025 and the cars are shared by everyone, just as posited in this thread.

Terrible movie, btw.
SpicewoodAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
Full car automation does not equal idleness. Some jobs will be reduced, and others will emerge.

Car automation is just a piece of the automation puzzle. Many, many other industries will also undergo similar transitions. And mostly in white collar and service industries not yet greatly affected by it.

Yes, some jobs may be created... eventually. But there may be a period of time (maybe even a decade or two) that have the potential to be pretty ugly.

I'm involved in task automation and simplification. There are definitely pros and cons. The cons being that the more that is automated, the fewer folks who truly understand how the system works or even when there might be problems. In some ways it dumbs people down because they don't think as much.

And, as someone who works with large, complex systems I find it hard for anyone to say that automated cars have been perfected given the issues I see daily from some of the top software systems in the world and the issues we find regularly with general release code. These car systems likely do well in sunny day scenarios. But I have a hard time believing that the complex testing in all the varieties of weather conditions, random events (such as deer crossings, 4 way stops with human drivers, etc.), hardware / software malfunctions, upgrades, sensor issues over time, all the varieties of roads and their conditions, etc. to say we're ready to put tens of millions of automated vehicles on the roads in <10 years.
Good points.

I too have serious doubts about the programming that guides these vehicles. Software doesn't obey a Moore's Law progression. Every line of software code is a potential bug/defect. A very long time ago I read the Microsoft Excel had 7,000,000 lines of code. It doesn't do anything where a person could die if there is a defect. It doesn't operate in real time - with data inputs from 1000s of sources.

These vehicles are not autonomous. They are highly dependent on networks - which are a source of instability and security vulnerabilities. If they communicate car to car, how is that done?

How will a self driving car decide not to drive through a low water crossing that was dry an hour ago? Will it see the water with sensors? Will it rely on satellite view?

I don't doubt this can become a reality eventually. But I think it is much further out than the optimistic here believe.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Watched Hot Tub Time Machine 2 yesterday and thought of this thread. It's 2025 and the cars are shared by everyone, just as posited in this thread.

Terrible movie, btw.
But I'm sure they made up for how terrible it would be with gratuitous nudity.
AggieFrog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Those mentioning that all vehicles will be automated in the next x-years... will motorcycles be automated as well or somehow outlawed? How would we transition older vehicles? Auto only lanes / roads. How will cops pull over these vehicles? Will it respond to officers directing traffic and if so how can it tell if it's a genuine officer (could you dress up like one and force an automated car to pull over)?

The more I think about it the more scenarios I can see that the software must account for. And more complexity means more room for mistakes, more testing, etc.

As someone pointed out, Tesla has noted that it can turn auto mode on with a software upgrade which seems odd given that Google said just recebtly that they are still 5 years away from having a workable production product.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Motorcycles don't cause many major accidents or death to people other than the rider. I'm not as worried about someone killing themselves and putting a small dent in someone else's car as I am someone drinking and driving, then heading the wrong way down a highway and killing people.

http://www.khou.com/story/news/2014/07/23/12108716/

Do that on a motorcycle and you pretty much just committed suicide and caused someone else to get a new hood and windshield.
Buck O Five
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Excellent thread. Human errors and inefficiencies on the road way are so significant that the bar is really low for automated roadways to replace us.

I tend to agree with one of the above posters who said that rural and suburban lifestyles will favor owning a vehicle, and leasing will work in high density commuter environments.

I don't want to get in a car where the passenger an hour ago spilled their cheerios, left a dirty diaper in the back, and covered the floor in pet fur.

Electric vehicles which require virtually no maintenance pairs well with the potential for solar roadways:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/12/tech/solar-powered-roads-coming-highway/
Buck O Five
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Media coverage biased against driverless cars:
http://www.skepticink.com/incredulous/2015/05/14/googlecars-1-million-miles-with-0-accidents-upsets-media/
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tesla and Google are talking about different things. Tesla's system, called Autopilot, is a highly advanced drive assist. It won't get you out of you neighborhood or into your parking garage, but you engage it like cruise control on the highway and then can take your hands off the wheel and feet off the pedals. That's just a current gen first step, but it's happening this year.

The motorcycle question is interesting, but ultimately a motorcycle's utility will be erased, I think. Self drive motorcycles are totally doable, though.

Driving yourself will never be illegal, I don't think. It will just become impractical. It's not illegal to drive an old Model T or a card drawn by oxen, and some people still do.

Cops largely won't have to work traffic, but they would likely have a way to pull over a self driving car, probably via the service provider/manufacturer. Impersonation of police would be no more an issue in that situation than it is today.

Lots of things to work out, but nothing insurmountable.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Driving yourself will never be illegal, I don't think. It will just become impractical.

I could see it being taxed heavily and becoming rare.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
Driving yourself will never be illegal, I don't think. It will just become impractical.

I could see it being taxed heavily and becoming rare.


Mostly I see insurance being too expensive. Like trying to get insurance today for some sort of inherently unsafe racing bike.
AggieFrog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
The motorcycle question is interesting, but ultimately a motorcycle's utility will be erased, I think. Self drive motorcycles are totally doable, though.

Motorcycles aren't generally used for utility - they're ridden because they're fun to ride. I don't see why you'd want to automate them. But so long as they exist, any automated vehicle has to account for them. Same for cyclists.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
The motorcycle question is interesting, but ultimately a motorcycle's utility will be erased, I think. Self drive motorcycles are totally doable, though.

Motorcycles aren't generally used for utility - they're ridden because they're fun to ride. I don't see why you'd want to automate them. But so long as they exist, any automated vehicle has to account for them. Same for cyclists.


Self drive autos detect pedestrians, so small vehicles should be no problem. I do suspect that there will be standard, maybe even required electronic beacons on manual cars, motorcycles, etc. that help identify them.
AggieFrog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
quote:
The motorcycle question is interesting, but ultimately a motorcycle's utility will be erased, I think. Self drive motorcycles are totally doable, though.

Motorcycles aren't generally used for utility - they're ridden because they're fun to ride. I don't see why you'd want to automate them. But so long as they exist, any automated vehicle has to account for them. Same for cyclists.


Self drive autos detect pedestrians, so small vehicles should be no problem. I do suspect that there will be standard, maybe even required electronic beacons on manual cars, motorcycles, etc. that help identify them.

Agreed but with that comes the assumption that we continue with the general road design / intersections / signage we have today so long as any manual vehicles are in standard use.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think that's one of the last things in the progression of our transportation. You're right that as long as manual cars are on the road, signage, intersections, etc. will persist.
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't see it as an issue. The machines of the future are also very good at telling you where to go and people depend on them a lot right now even though all the signage and stuff exists. The network will already exist to tell the computers how to reach destinations, if you want to drive on the network, you'll simply depend on your nav whether from a device like a phone, or like the current in car displays, heads up display helmet for drivers, or whatever. Navigation and GPS are going to improve as well over time and probably will become better than road signage.

Intersections trickier to get rid of, might be replaced with something more like access limiting roadways. You cant get on the high speed roads where cars whiz by one other in multiple directions, but you can go this other way, type thing.
SpicewoodAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I do see an interesting issue listed above - driverless cars and suburban sprawl. I am sick and tired of "new urbanists" telling us we have to live in dense cities. I am willing to commute to have the space, privacy, and freedom I get living outside the city. Self driving cars is an in your face alternative to these urbanists.

Mass transit is an answer for some, but not everyone.

I love cars, driving, etc. But there are times it would be terrific to just get in a car and tell it where to take me.
Old School Brother
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I didn't read this whole thread, so this may have already been said, but i think that the biggest benefit to driverless vehicles traffic-wise would be for big trucks. those guys taking an hour to pass each other causes a ton of the traffic issues on highways. plus, it would eliminate the need for those guys to stop and rest every day.

i guess the downside is maximum overdrive.
MGS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Downside:

This and all of the other software bugs that have caused Airbuses to fall out of the sky.
benMath08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Downside:

This and all of the other software bugs that have caused Airbuses to fall out of the sky.
and yet they are still safer than human-controlled automobiles by an incredibly wide margin
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
Downside:

This and all of the other software bugs that have caused Airbuses to fall out of the sky.
and yet they are still safer than human-controlled automobiles by an incredibly wide margin


And the options for a plane in the event of a carastrophic error are far more limited than in a car.

Also, most vehicular accidents resulting in injuries or deaths involve two vehicles. If a self-drive car goes haywire, other self drive cars on the road still have a very good chance of avoiding a collision because they can instantly react.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.