quote:quote:I asked for the evidence on page one and received an "oy vey" response.quote:How would it not be derived from science to hold that the bones came from living a animals? Especially given the overwhelming supporting evidence?quote:I would assume so. It would be a premise, not derived from science, but from the assumption that all bones come from once living creatures.
But even if just using Earth as a dump for the bones, were they not one alive???
Because it's an ignorant question that a second grader could begin to answer. And you were given evidence like coprolites, footprints, eggs, articulated skeletons, evidence of scarring, wounds, and even infections on the bones, the preservation of collagen, pieces of proteins, feather and skin imprints, Dinosaur mummies with preserved imprints of tissue and organs. Fossilized animals with smaller animals in their stomachs, fossilized animals sitting on nests with eggs containing juvenile versions of the same animals. And so on and so on. Only a desperate fool would try to claim they aren't from previously living animals.