Forums
Football
- News
- Schedule
- SEC Standings
- Roster
- Staff
- Class Breakdown
Recruiting
Sports
- Football
- Basketball
- Baseball
- Women's Basketball
- Soccer
- Softball
- Volleyball
Premium
Sponsors
- Sponsors
- Advertise With Us
United
More
- Podcasts
- Media
- TexAgs Radio
- Post of the Day
- iOS App
- Search
- Store
- Pick-Off
- 12th Man Foundation
- Our Staff
- Contact Us
- Help Center

| Register

Football Recruiting

News Commits Offers Liucci 44 Rankings OOS All Recruits

Status:

Uncommitted

HIGH SCHOOL

Ean Beek

Running Back

185 lbs

Katy, TX

Taylor

Class of 2018

Rating: n/a

National Avg

Rating: 79.0

School Preferences

Abilene Christian

Medium

Army

Medium

Houston Christian

Medium

Updates

7 yr ago by Ryan Brauninger

Late night recruiting quick hitters

With the Ags playing in state this weekend, expect to see some of the coaching staff hit some games to see their top prospects play the next couple of nights. I'm hearing from a couple of Houston area sources that Kevin Sumlin could make an appearance at some games starting tomorrow night. If that does happen, it's a good bet that Katy vs Katy Taylor ( Corey Bethley, Connor Galvin, Max Wright, Camron Horry, Ean Beek) and CyRanch vs. CyFair ( RJ Sneed, Amaud Willis-Dalton, Colten Blanton, Brock Wright, Austin Deculus) will be on the docket. It also wouldn't surprise me to see Jeff Banks and Clarence McKinney make the rounds the next couple nights either. Got a quick update on Hutto DE Ondario Robinson tonight as well. The central Texas source I spoke with says Ondario is getting close to decision time (he's hearing 7-10 days), and my contact continued on to say things are trending heavily A&M's way. Not much in terms of ground breaking info, but it does mesh with what we've been hearing and putting out. Also, don't sleep on a pair of Arizona pass rushers in Odua Isibor and My-King Johnson. While they may not have been getting much run, I don't believe the Ags have completely closed the book in the desert.

Photos

(4 Total)

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”

Follow TexAgs