default image
Status:
Uncommitted

Tyree Gray

Defensive End
6′2″ / 245 lbs
Houston, TX
Klein Forest
Class of 2013
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: n/a
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
None
 
Baylor
None
 
Oklahoma
None
 

Updates

TexAgs' Top Tens: Summer kickoff edition
11 yr ago by Billy Liucci
TexAgs' Top Tens: Summer kickoff edition
With the release of the updated Top 113 in '13 recruiting rankings, Liucci spotlights the best of the best — the top players, as it stands now, at every position in the Lone Star State in 2013. Who made the cut?
TexAgs' Top Tens: Difference-makers in D-end ranks
12 yr ago by Billy Liucci
TexAgs' Top Tens: Difference-makers in D-end ranks
The countdown to the release of the first Top 113 in '13 list is nearing its end, and the reveal continues with the ten best defensive ends in Texas in the 2013 class. Three of the top four remain uncommitted.
Recruiting Notes: New offers, Junior Days & rising stars
12 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Recruiting Notes: New offers, Junior Days & rising stars
A&M's 2013 efforts kicked off before the '12 class was ever inked. With it now the sole focus, Liucci updates the latest on the trail, including who has joined A&M's radar and an interesting note on Isaiah Golden.
The recruiting world with Matt Davis
12 yr ago by Logan Lee
The recruiting world with Matt Davis
Matt Davis, one of the more vocal A&M commits in the class of 2012, gives TexAgs.com a view of the recruiting game from his perspective, the friendships he's made and what to expect in the future.
A trip through Klein ISD
12 yr ago by Logan Lee
A trip through Klein ISD
TexAgs.com made the rounds through Klein Collins, Klein Oak and Klein Forest yesterday. Logan Lee talked with a handful of recruits and interviewed Aggie commit Matt Davis.
All Updates

Photos

(2 Total)

Career Stats

Season

Honors

2011

13-5A Second Team All-District
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.