Aundre Smith

Running Back

5′9″ / 175 lbs

Missouri City, TX

Ft Bend Travis

Class of 2021

Rating: n/a

National Avg

Rating: n/a

School Preferences

Updates

4 yr ago by Ryan Brauninger

Visitor List - Auburn

Here's what we've got. We'll undoubtedly be making additions throughout the rest of the week. We are still awaiting some more confirmations. Official VisitorsMarietta (GA) TE Arik Gilbert Unofficial VisitorsCommitsFt Bend Kempner OL Akinola Ogunbiyi Ft Bend Hightower OL Smart Chibuzo The Woodlands College Park OL Josh Bankhead Cibolo Steele CB Jaylon Jones Tomball WR Demond Demas A&M Consolidated WR Devin Price Ft Bend Bush LB Kenneth Phillips Southlake Carroll TE Blake Smith Navasota OL Jordan Jefferson 2021 Denton Guyer QB Eli Stowers 2021 North Shore WR Shadrach Banks Uncommitted Prospects2020'sNorth Shore LB Matthew Roberts Ft Bend Marshall RB Devon Achane Ft Bend Marshall QB Malik Hornsby Carthage OL Ty'Kieast Crawford (Arkansas)Ft Bend Marshall OLB Warren Robinson (UTSA)North Shore RB Zach Evans - maybe 2021'sRichmond Foster OL Reuben Fatheree Bellaire Episcopal OL Cullen Montgomery Bellaire Episcopal OL Donovan Jackson Katy Taylor OL Bryce Foster Fort Collins (CO) OL Trey Zuhn North Shore QB Dematrius Davis Katy Tompkins DE Tunmise Adeleye Port Arthur Memorial DE Jordon Thomas - maybeDallas Skyline WR Quaydarius Davis (Texas)Pearland RB Brandon Campbell Ft Bend Ridge Point WR John Paul Richardson North Shore OL Jaeden Roberts Denton Guyer WR KJ Liggins Atascocita WR/TE Landen King Ft Bend Travis RB Aundre Smith Alief Taylor CB Jahiree Pittman-AndersonPasadena Dobie RB Darius Hale 2022'sShadow Creek S Jaidan Scott Shadow Creek TE Trent McGaughey Brenham CB Eric Hemphill III Manvel CB Alejandro Colbert Port Arthur Memorial CB Jaylon Guilbeau Katy CB Hamilton McMartin New Braunfels OL James DawnShadow Creek ATH Randy Masters Spring ATH Dorian Friend

Photos

(3 Total)

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”

Follow TexAgs