default image
Status:
Committed

Floyd Raven

Defensive Back
6′2″ / 180 lbs
Reserve, LA
East St. John (LA)
Class of 2011
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: 91.6
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
Committed
2/2/2011
LSU
None
 
Ole Miss
None
 

Updates

Recruiting Battles: Texas A&M Aggies vs. Ole Miss Rebels
6 yr ago by Jason Howell
Recruiting Battles: Texas A&M Aggies vs. Ole Miss Rebels
Texas A&M and Ole Miss have met on the recruiting trail many times over the years, and the frequency has only increased since the Aggies joined the SEC in 2012. Jason Howell runs down the top players the Ags and Rebels have fought over.
Five in 5: Newcomers to keep an eye on in fall camp
12 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Five in 5: Newcomers to keep an eye on in fall camp
Five days remain until the beginning of fall camp for the Aggies. In the spirit of the season, TexAgs' Billy Liucci will break down the five most notable aspects of the team, one per day. First: Notable newcomers.
The latest in football on the eve of media days
12 yr ago by Billy Liucci
The latest in football on the eve of media days
With Big 12 media days beginning tomorrow, TexAgs' Billy Liucci runs down the latest in the Aggies' summer work, as well as who will surprise this season and how the A&M freshmen are progressing.
Monroe thinking about the future
12 yr ago by Logan Lee
Monroe thinking about the future
Darion Monroe talked to TexAgs.com about his progress throughout the summer and the plan to move from the offensive side of the ball to playing defense.
Encouraging signs abound with August nearing
12 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Encouraging signs abound with August nearing
TexAgs' Billy Liucci breaks down recent developments within the Aggie football program as the 2011 season approaches. Look inside for news and notes on summer workouts, the D-line, inbound freshmen and more.
All Updates

Photos

(4 Total)
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.