ArkyAg99 said:
for the love of God. Clanga are hunting off speed. Throw a fastball in. So frustrating that the Ags dont want to challenge them inside.
Sorry, I've drawn offsides.
AMEN!!! AMEN!!!
I'VE BEEN SAYING THIS ALL SEASON LONG AND PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ALL OVER ME FOR MY POSTS.
A pitcher
must make the hitter uncomfortable. Not reckless, not dangerous
uncomfortable. That 6 inches to a foot off the inside black is where you establish dominance, timing disruption, and doubt. If hitters can dive across the plate without fear, your entire arsenal shrinks. These hitters that are hit/grazed on the foot, arm, etc.; this is part of hitting and you just have to get out of the way. Again, players these days wear protective gear to prevent injury.
When your batters start getting hit in the upper torso and head areas, it's a totally different story.
BEFORE YOU REPLY SAYING RETALIATION IS WRONG and/or disagree, or maybe don't understand, please Bing or Google the following:
- "what is the philosophy on pitching inside in baseball"
- "what is the philosophy on pitching retaliation in baseball"
I've been saying after several of our players have been HIT IN THE HEAD that we need to retaliate after this type of play as a deterrence measure enforced on opposing teams. If you create the reputation as a pitching staff that establishes the inside portion of the plate as a high traffic area, you will see your pitching staff can get the outside corner pitches as called strikes more often because of this RESPECT (i.e., the hitter doesn't have to cover the inside portion of the hitting zone--the 6 inches to a foot inside).
Below is a cut-n-paste from an article
"This is how baseball has policed itself for 150 years.
Not by beanball wars.
Not by reckless revenge.
But by sending a clear message:
Quote:
"If you endanger our hitters, we will reclaim the inside corner and you will feel it."
That's not violence.
That's
preventative baseball."
I know it's against the baseball rules (IF, they enforce--again how many games have our players missed or are adversely affected due to injury) and against our societal beliefs/ethics (again, I get it), but in competition sometimes the justification of retaliation is the only way you can bring PEACE (a deterrence) to your players, as they stop being targets for the opposing teams when their players start getting hit and/or pitched inside. Our pitchers hardly ever come inside on the opposing hitters. Please note, when we have their hitters in an 0-2 or 1-2 count, we seem to ALWAYS use the outside portion of the plate.
Getting hit, lets define this. What I'm saying our pitchers do is when retaliating, you are throwing at meaty/muscular portions (i.e., thighs, buttocks, below the torso area...) of the hitter where it doesn't injure the opposing hitter. However, it is blatantly obvious to the opposing team(s) (i.e., teams you will play later on your schedule) you are standing up for your players and will not tolerate.
Below is a cut-n-paste from the retaliation portion (from above), and to an extent I agree--EXCEPT WHEN OUR PLAYERS ARE BEING HIT, YOU RETALIATE.
"Core ethical frameworkMcAleer draws on Socratic ethics, which hold that one should never willingly do wrong, even in response to wrongdoing. Socrates argues that retaliating is not different from doing wrong, and that "antadikein" (returning a wrong) is itself a wrong
bing.com. This aligns with pacifist and non-retaliatory moral traditions, such as those of Martin Luther King Jr. and Mohandas Gandhi."
From that same posting:
"SummaryFrom a philosophical standpoint, especially Socratic ethics, pitching retaliation is generally wrong because it is itself a wrong. The only conceivable exception is when the pitcher's team has been wrongfully harmed, but even then, the ethical justification is narrow and often outweighed by the sport's rules and norms."
I can understand your philosophy if you disagree, as the old saying "two wrongs don't make a right." (on a lighter matter, "however, three left turns do"). However, there are numerous other sayings/quotes as "The will to survive is not as important as the will to prevail... the answer to criminal aggression is retaliation."