csag97 said:
The epic meltdown in Florida? Lack of leadership at the top?
AginCircleC said:
Marginally productive
Basketball and Chain said:AginCircleC said:
Marginally productive
Interesting comment. Mainly because I think it's inaccurate.
One booted ball might be a fluke, but 2 in a row? I think that's probably a trend line of costly errors that lost A&M the game. It was a pretty epic meltdown even by A&M standards. 2 playable ground balls and the subsequent walks with 1 out to go is pretty tough to argue isn't a meltdown. I don't think Show and Milligan are leaving because of it, but the program does have some real questions going forward.Sandman98 said:csag97 said:
The epic meltdown in Florida? Lack of leadership at the top?
Two flukey booted balls is indicative of the state of the program? Why do you even follow baseball and softball?
cevans_40 said:Basketball and Chain said:AginCircleC said:
Marginally productive
Interesting comment. Mainly because I think it's inaccurate.
Milligan lost playing time to Fortenberry late in the year and Trinity and Peyton seemed to do the majority of the pitching.
That incident against ASU was a case of runner interference that wasn't called. The runner on 2nd hit her glove with her foot as she ran by.Quote:
Better coaching the mental side of the game, and attention to detail. I can remember a similar booted ball a few years back, late in the game, against ASU that I think cost us a WCWS appearance.
The main problem with Evans is that her recruiting classes look great until the MLB draft destroys them.DogCompany74 said:
Jo Evans is no different than an entire generation of A&M coaches who have been allowed to chalk up appearances in postseason as " successful" seasons.
While the softball facilities are just now state of the art , I can only assume that Coach Evans has been using Davis Field as a recruiting tool for all 2019 and beyond . If in fact she can not recruit top tier talent with Davis Field and her 20+ year tenure here then maybe her failure to get to OKC and to win championships is the reason she can't get the best here.
ObviousLazyRiverIsObvious said:The main problem with Evans is that her recruiting classes look great until the MLB draft destroys them.DogCompany74 said:
Jo Evans is no different than an entire generation of A&M coaches who have been allowed to chalk up appearances in postseason as " successful" seasons.
While the softball facilities are just now state of the art , I can only assume that Coach Evans has been using Davis Field as a recruiting tool for all 2019 and beyond . If in fact she can not recruit top tier talent with Davis Field and her 20+ year tenure here then maybe her failure to get to OKC and to win championships is the reason she can't get the best here.
sharpdressedman said:
IMO the upside to the season was the girls' always playing very hard and never giving up. Like I have done for decades, I'll hope for a better year next year and support the team, win or lose. Having a wonderful facility is a new and great advantage, and I am confident it will pay large dividends for a long time.
See y'all at Davis Diamond next season!
Look, I'm not going to say that Jo is on par with Walton or Gasso, but Evans is far from "mediocre." If you want to have more credibility on this board you should probably choose better descriptors. Jo has been to the WCWS four times with two different programs, and while that's not among the elite of the elite, it's certainly far better than mediocre.Quote:
It is not going to cure any ills of her being a mediocre coach who can't seem to hire any decent assistants to put her over the top.
Totally agree. And her programs have been a lot closer to where we want our teams than the Big 3, while playing in a very tough league. In my mind, she's about as close to being "elite" as you can be without being elite. Hopefully the new field helps her get over that hump.Belton Ag said:Look, I'm not going to say that Jo is on par with Walton or Gasso, but Evans is far from "mediocre." If you want to have more credibility on this board you should probably choose better descriptors. Jo has been to the WCWS four times with two different programs, and while that's not among the elite of the elite, it's certainly far better than mediocre.Quote:
It is not going to cure any ills of her being a mediocre coach who can't seem to hire any decent assistants to put her over the top.
Belton Ag said:Look, I'm not going to say that Jo is on par with Walton or Gasso, but Evans is far from "mediocre." If you want to have more credibility on this board you should probably choose better descriptors. Jo has been to the WCWS four times with two different programs, and while that's not among the elite of the elite, it's certainly far better than mediocre.Quote:
It is not going to cure any ills of her being a mediocre coach who can't seem to hire any decent assistants to put her over the top.
We see this time and time again on these forums. The verbiage is ratcheted to the extreme, to the point where it becomes demagogic. It's perfectly fine to think Jo doesn't perform well enough for our expectations; I'd tend to agree with that. It's another thing to spew ignorance.
Edit: I'd also like to add that she did go out and hire Glasco, who was one of the top assistants in the country, but ultimately lost him to Auburn because we didn't want to pay him after tying up millions luring Jimbo here.
I'll take that into consideration Thanks.cevans_40 said:Belton Ag said:Look, I'm not going to say that Jo is on par with Walton or Gasso, but Evans is far from "mediocre." If you want to have more credibility on this board you should probably choose better descriptors. Jo has been to the WCWS four times with two different programs, and while that's not among the elite of the elite, it's certainly far better than mediocre.Quote:
It is not going to cure any ills of her being a mediocre coach who can't seem to hire any decent assistants to put her over the top.
We see this time and time again on these forums. The verbiage is ratcheted to the extreme, to the point where it becomes demagogic. It's perfectly fine to think Jo doesn't perform well enough for our expectations; I'd tend to agree with that. It's another thing to spew ignorance.
Edit: I'd also like to add that she did go out and hire Glasco, who was one of the top assistants in the country, but ultimately lost him to Auburn because we didn't want to pay him after tying up millions luring Jimbo here.
While this is true there are many on this board that have a hard time dealing with the truth. I said last season that Jo should get 2-3 years with the new park to build a powerhouse. I stand by that claim and feel she at least deserves that.
Aggies2009 said:I'll take that into consideration Thanks.cevans_40 said:Belton Ag said:Look, I'm not going to say that Jo is on par with Walton or Gasso, but Evans is far from "mediocre." If you want to have more credibility on this board you should probably choose better descriptors. Jo has been to the WCWS four times with two different programs, and while that's not among the elite of the elite, it's certainly far better than mediocre.Quote:
It is not going to cure any ills of her being a mediocre coach who can't seem to hire any decent assistants to put her over the top.
We see this time and time again on these forums. The verbiage is ratcheted to the extreme, to the point where it becomes demagogic. It's perfectly fine to think Jo doesn't perform well enough for our expectations; I'd tend to agree with that. It's another thing to spew ignorance.
Edit: I'd also like to add that she did go out and hire Glasco, who was one of the top assistants in the country, but ultimately lost him to Auburn because we didn't want to pay him after tying up millions luring Jimbo here.
While this is true there are many on this board that have a hard time dealing with the truth. I said last season that Jo should get 2-3 years with the new park to build a powerhouse. I stand by that claim and feel she at least deserves that.