Does anyone know why that play from this weekend was reviewed? In looking at what I can find, the rule is as follows:
The following plays will be reviewable:
a. Deciding if a batted ball is fair or foul. The ball must first touch the ground or a fielder beyond the initial position of the first or third baseman.
b. Deciding if a batted ball is either a ground rule double or a home run.
c. Any catch or no catch in the outfield or foul territory.
d. A call of "no catch" can be changed to "catch" within the infield only if it results in a third out with any runners on base, or any time with a batter runner only.
e. Spectator interference.
f. Deciding scoring plays at home plate inclusive of collisions (illegal and/or malicious slides) or time plays.
I thought our play was just a grounder to 2B that Choruby beat out, not sure how that fits into any of these categories. Unless it falls under "F" since someone scored on that play, even though the play wasn't at the plate?
The following plays will be reviewable:
a. Deciding if a batted ball is fair or foul. The ball must first touch the ground or a fielder beyond the initial position of the first or third baseman.
b. Deciding if a batted ball is either a ground rule double or a home run.
c. Any catch or no catch in the outfield or foul territory.
d. A call of "no catch" can be changed to "catch" within the infield only if it results in a third out with any runners on base, or any time with a batter runner only.
e. Spectator interference.
f. Deciding scoring plays at home plate inclusive of collisions (illegal and/or malicious slides) or time plays.
I thought our play was just a grounder to 2B that Choruby beat out, not sure how that fits into any of these categories. Unless it falls under "F" since someone scored on that play, even though the play wasn't at the plate?