From 12 to 16 feet that matches the NBA. You for or against this proposal that will be voted on shortly?
ironmanag said:
In a world driven by scoring points and no defense. The NCAA wants to keep up.
Yeah, that's like my Dad's take on the NBA. "No defense."expresswrittenconsent said:ironmanag said:
In a world driven by scoring points and no defense. The NCAA wants to keep up.
That's not really true but it sounds good.
wacarnolds said:
seems like a good way to help space out the game
PatAg said:
Need to move the 3pt line out to NBA range
Exactly.ironmanag said:
In a world driven by scoring points and no defense. The NCAA wants to keep up.
TxAg76 said:
Widen the lane? Sure. Makes sense.
Move the 3 pt line back? Sure. Makes sense.
And while we're at it, go ahead and raise the rim to 12 FT
I'd be a fan... Anything that de-emphasizes the three pointer at this point.expresswrittenconsent said:
You dont need to widen the court to remove that "disadvantage". Just dont have the shorter corner 3. When the line goes out of bounds near the extended high block, there are no baseline 3's.
There's an EZ O.G. way to handle it. If the defender is moving, it can't be a charge.Method Man said:
They should get rid of charges.
If you move out the lane and remove 3 pointers, then you create a clunkfest of midrange shot bricks, the worst shot in the game.Aston04 said:I'd be a fan... Anything that de-emphasizes the three pointer at this point.expresswrittenconsent said:
You dont need to widen the court to remove that "disadvantage". Just dont have the shorter corner 3. When the line goes out of bounds near the extended high block, there are no baseline 3's.