Rosy Finch Boy said:
How is it out of line? BK would have been fired no later than year four if it wasn't for the Parkinson's. We all know that. It isn't garbage it is the truth.
The AD (and the BK sympathetic boosters) are never going to fire BK no matter how poorly he performs. He will retire when he sees fit. He could pull a Melvin and be fine.
If he pulled a Melvin, I have absolutely no doubt that he would be fired.
The simple truth is, no matter what the likes of us (being optimistic let's say 50 of us that are really hardcore hoops fans and think that this program is capable of being a really good program) think, is that we have made the sweet sixteen two of the last three years, and that's all that most people care about.
I will agree that maybe it played a factor early on. And sure, we can all agree all we want that he should have been fired in year one, or two, or three or four, pick your favorite year. And maybe if we'd have had a real AD he would have even with his condition, but it doesn't matter now.
He's been good enough the last three years that expecting him to get fired at A&M is just completely unreasonable. Never going to happen. Doesn't matter if he has Parkinson's or not.
He hasn't been fired because he's met the expectations that most people, especially the ones that matter, have for our basketball program. It's really that simple. So he's not 'bulletproof because of his illness,' which is why I think that's out of line, he's 'bulletproof' because most people on the street think he's doing a pretty good job.