Nice clean look but I would have put two parallel maroon stripes somewhere...side of the shirt/shorts or on the shoes, or both.

Is the logo on the front of the shorts a thing now?

Jersey seems nice and should look good maroon. Those shorts look really bad. Like the clearance bin at a discount store bad. Like they have pockets bad.

Ugh....Adidas.....
Why do so many people think Euros know how to dress??????

1. NO - to logo on front of shorts, If the logo was on the side maybe, but not the front
2. They do look like they have pockets
3. Uniform is too small for player, size too small. Almost looks like someone gained some weight over the summer and still trying to fit into last year's uniform

Or maybe the player has beefed up. Doesn't look out of shape to me.

txag72 said:

---

Or maybe the player has beefed up. Doesn't look out of shape to me.

---

He never said anything about anyone being out of shape. The post was talking about the fit of the uniform, not about the fitness level of the player wearing the uniform. The jersey seems to fit intentionally small, which is an unusual combo with the blousy shorts with the large, weirdly placed logo and lack of any striping along either the waistband, legs, or down the sides.

Its also, to be admidltted, a very small, very short, not even front and back view of one color option so probably not worth freaking out about yet.

Ags #1 said:

---

They could wear hot pink but who cares if they win??

---

So you'd be good if they went nude with body paint numbers?

I'm in. They'll look really good on a 25-x NCAAT team.

It it meant winning a natty then yes

What is with the grey lettered uniform?

Maroon uniforms look good in that video

Hop said:

---

Not a fan of the logo on the shorts...

---

And it's beveled, making it even worse