How is your conclusion supported by evidence? Statistically they were roughly equal last season, Davis averaged a couple more points, Williams averaged slightly more rebounds and way more blocks. I'm not sure that's enough evidence to support a theory that Williams is more valuable to the team. Especially when part of my entire argument rests on something that won't really have any empirical evidence. You can't measure how much better Williams' season was because Davis is on the team, and vice versa.
(For the record, I'm assuming you mean "valuable to the program" in basketball terms only. We're not talking about selling tickets or media mentions or anything. That would be a whole different thing.)
I'm not necessarily saying you're wrong. I disagree with what you're saying but I'm not saying I'm definitely right. I'm just saying I don't think either position in this particular debate has much evidence to this point.
(For the record, I'm assuming you mean "valuable to the program" in basketball terms only. We're not talking about selling tickets or media mentions or anything. That would be a whole different thing.)
I'm not necessarily saying you're wrong. I disagree with what you're saying but I'm not saying I'm definitely right. I'm just saying I don't think either position in this particular debate has much evidence to this point.