CT'97 said:PMC changed because they couldn't stop breaking laws.2004FIGHTINTXAG said:ABATTBQ87 said:
Another first, Rose Marshall '19 B-1 assumes command of the PMC.
PMC died a long time ago due to politics.
Agree. They did it to themselves.
CT'97 said:PMC changed because they couldn't stop breaking laws.2004FIGHTINTXAG said:ABATTBQ87 said:
Another first, Rose Marshall '19 B-1 assumes command of the PMC.
PMC died a long time ago due to politics.
CT'97 said:I'm curious when has the selection of the mascot corporal not been political?Montgomery Burns said:
I'm curious what the selection process is like these days. I have no doubt a female could earn this position, but honestly...I could see it as a political move too.
Then why is this crap on the military board?Champ Bailey said:Pro Sandy said:
Because women?
Why are women being in outfits bad? The military has integrated just about everything. Even submarines have women on board now.
The corps isn't the military. The university has made it very clear that it is a student led leadership organization. It actually lost the last Commandant over this change. Half the students in it don't go into the military after. If students in it feel that they benefit more from an all male experience, all female experience, or a mix, then they should be able to.
And you are going to tell me that wasn't a political decision?Champ Bailey said:CT'97 said:I'm curious when has the selection of the mascot corporal not been political?Montgomery Burns said:
I'm curious what the selection process is like these days. I have no doubt a female could earn this position, but honestly...I could see it as a political move too.
I know when i was there 5 years ago, it was completely left to the outfit to decide.
CT'97 said:And you are going to tell me that wasn't a political decision?Champ Bailey said:CT'97 said:I'm curious when has the selection of the mascot corporal not been political?Montgomery Burns said:
I'm curious what the selection process is like these days. I have no doubt a female could earn this position, but honestly...I could see it as a political move too.
I know when i was there 5 years ago, it was completely left to the outfit to decide.
When was that?snowmnag970 said:
God Bless the Corps and the way she used to be.
your story resonated with me on a couple of points. the first is that my old man is class of 68 VMI and was a jock. it definitely seemed like he got special treatment!HollywoodBQ said:
In fact, Texas A&M and Virginia Tech are probably the only programs where the athletes aren't also members of the Cadet Corps. One funny aside I learned from a VMI buddy I went to the Armor School with - they hate athletes because they always sham their way out of any Corps games to go do some athletic activity. We didn't have this problem at A&M because having NCAA athletes in the Corps was extremely rare.
Ol Jock 99 said:
Joe was a kinder, gentler CT.
That was hilarious.Hincemm said:
"VMI is admitting women! What's next, UVA is admitting men?!"
Federale01 said:
I have never understood why Reveille became the exclusive purview of E2 anyway. I think a lot of the upset E2 fighters should be happy she is still in the company and not passed around as a reward for the best grades or recruiting effort. The E2 guys in the other thread who were bragging about how great the outfit used to be dont Acknowledge E2 has a huge recruiting advantage because of the mascot and the chance to become mascot corporal. If you take that a way, not much separates it from other strong Regiment outfits like H1 of C2.
The Corps re-organized after the 1958-59 school year and E-2 emerged with Reveille in the 1960 AggielandMontgomery Burns said:Federale01 said:
I have never understood why Reveille became the exclusive purview of E2 anyway. I think a lot of the upset E2 fighters should be happy she is still in the company and not passed around as a reward for the best grades or recruiting effort. The E2 guys in the other thread who were bragging about how great the outfit used to be dont Acknowledge E2 has a huge recruiting advantage because of the mascot and the chance to become mascot corporal. If you take that a way, not much separates it from other strong Regiment outfits like H1 of C2.
Let's not forget she originally belonged to the BQs, and she was allowed to roam free at halftime. The story is a commandant got tired of people placing bets for what hardline she would poop on.
ABATTBQ87 said:The Corps re-organized after the 1958-59 school year and E-2 emerged with Reveille in the 1960 AggielandMontgomery Burns said:Federale01 said:
I have never understood why Reveille became the exclusive purview of E2 anyway. I think a lot of the upset E2 fighters should be happy she is still in the company and not passed around as a reward for the best grades or recruiting effort. The E2 guys in the other thread who were bragging about how great the outfit used to be dont Acknowledge E2 has a huge recruiting advantage because of the mascot and the chance to become mascot corporal. If you take that a way, not much separates it from other strong Regiment outfits like H1 of C2.
Let's not forget she originally belonged to the BQs, and she was allowed to roam free at halftime. The story is a commandant got tired of people placing bets for what hardline she would poop on.
AGGies0311 said:
The new mascot corporal is on a Marine ROTC scholarship, has a 300 PFT score, and can do 20 dead hang pull ups.... Seems like that makes her more than qualified enough to walk a dog around.....
AGGies0311 said:
Two of the top three candidates were female...... in the end who really cares.. Our university will get a lot of good publicity about this as well.. Win win, its a win for equality and a win for our public image.
You do not know if she was/wasn't. I have qualified all of my statements with "IF" she was picked because of her gender. I do not know if she was or was not, and I have said as much. But she COULD have been, and the Corps has done this in the past with negative outcomes for cadets (see 1SG of E2 last year).AGGies0311 said:
She wasn't picked because of gender.... actually you're the sexist one who thinks anytime a female gets a position that it's part of some agenda.... in your bigoted brain you can only see a male walking the dog.
AGGies0311 said:
Link 1SG of E-2 thread please
Jokes on them. Next Rev will be a male.AGGies0311 said:
Two of the top three candidates were female...... in the end who really cares.. Our university will get a lot of good publicity about this as well.. Win win, its a win for equality and a win for our public image.
Big Foot are more prevalent than a NCAA scholarship athlete/CT. It's too hard for them. To much structure. Well it used to be anyway. Was not scholarship but it did get you out of a butt load of formations.HollywoodBQ said:
One funny aside I learned from a VMI buddy I went to the Armor School with - they hate athletes because they always sham their way out of any Corps games to go do some athletic activity. We didn't have this problem at A&M because having NCAA athletes in the Corps was extremely rare.