Big 12-0 said:
No talk, just facts:
SEC BAD?
Nice job of misstating the article's title, and changing its meaning into something 180 degrees of what the article sets out to say. The actual title is,
"Is SEC's playoff dominance bad for college football?"
A few quotes from the article further crush the narrative you have been trying to put out there:
"The SEC's latest run is unparalleled in the history of the sport. The league has qualified 18 teams to the last 16 national championship games and only one of those 16 title bouts didn't have at least one SEC team in it. The parity within college footballmostly nonexistent historically
is only worsening.
Any sports association, amateur or professional, benefits from healthy and legitimate competition. And for now, one conference is dominating enough to have sent the sport into a somewhat monotonous postseason.
The best teams, the best coaches, the most money, on and on, all reside in the South and the SEC.
Excluding the latest cycle, the 11-state SEC footprint has produced 197 five-star prospects since 2011. The other 39 states have churned out 134. The SEC gets the best players, wins the most games, makes the most money and so on. It's a cycle.
The SEC's stranglehold on college football feels tighter than ever with no sign of loosening."
A swing and a huge miss. Keep trying, though.